04-01-2011, 02:20 AM
JIm Fetzer:
"For him to argue at this stage of the debate that there is no evidence that LBJ was handling
Oswald in New Orleans has to establish a new level of absurdity, ..."
Jim Fetzer, a few posts later:
"I HAVE NEVER SUGGESTED THAT LBJ WAS CONTROLLING OSWALD ANYWHERE."
Well Jim, which is it? Is there or isn't there?
And by the way, how do you know when CD receives books he ends up reading but does not like? I mean there is more than one person who had that reaction to Nelson. Martin Hay got two chapters into the book and tossed it.
And you never answered my questions did you?
What did LBJ have to do with the murder of Officer Tippit?
Did Mac Wallace kill Kennedy? If he did,who were the other assassins?
How did LBJ get RUby to kill Oswald?
You say Nelson's book is so fine, then go ahead and explain how LBJ masterminded those three events.
Because if he did not, then what is left is the cover up. And as DOn GIbson proved, the Warren COmmission was not even Johnson's idea.
"For him to argue at this stage of the debate that there is no evidence that LBJ was handling
Oswald in New Orleans has to establish a new level of absurdity, ..."
Jim Fetzer, a few posts later:
"I HAVE NEVER SUGGESTED THAT LBJ WAS CONTROLLING OSWALD ANYWHERE."
Well Jim, which is it? Is there or isn't there?
And by the way, how do you know when CD receives books he ends up reading but does not like? I mean there is more than one person who had that reaction to Nelson. Martin Hay got two chapters into the book and tossed it.
And you never answered my questions did you?
What did LBJ have to do with the murder of Officer Tippit?
Did Mac Wallace kill Kennedy? If he did,who were the other assassins?
How did LBJ get RUby to kill Oswald?
You say Nelson's book is so fine, then go ahead and explain how LBJ masterminded those three events.
Because if he did not, then what is left is the cover up. And as DOn GIbson proved, the Warren COmmission was not even Johnson's idea.