06-01-2011, 05:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-01-2011, 06:03 AM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Rob:
Everyone knows about Mena. It was part of the whole illegal Iran/COntra scandal.
THe reason Starr did not go into it is easy to discern: Because if he did, the trail would lead back to the White House. THat is the kind of gutless hack Starr was.
Your other stuff about that money grubbing Gennifer Flowers, please.
See, you obviously do not understand the first thing about propaganda paradigms. That is why you were so gullible to swallow Scaife's.
When I first read Ruddy's phony report about the "murder" of FOster, I immediately understood what Ruddy had done. He had modeled his work on what the WC critics had done back in 1966-67. THat is, he was going to raise doubts about the handgun, the position of the body etc.
Except for one thing: as Lee later explained, it was all faulty data. Just the opposite of what the WC critics had done. THey had good data. Which the WC had buried or disguised.
ANd this is what I mean. To somehow equate the likes of Al Ruddy and Scaife with people like Sylvia Meagher and Marzani is bonkers. Its a world turned topsy turvy. ANd using someone like Larry Nichols as a witness is like using Brennan or Markham, or some of the people SHeridan interviewed in jail to use against Garrison. And if you want me to prove that, I will.
What you don' t understand is this: what people like Hersh and Reeves do is two things:
1.) THey want to cheapen who JFK is, in hopes that people will say, "Well the philanderer and marijuana smoker deserved what he got." ITs the same agenda the SS had with Hersh.
2.) THey want to distract from the real issues about the assassination. The real issues, as far as i am concerned were:
1. Vietnam
2. Cuba
3. Detente with Russia
4. Upcoming recognition of China
5. Federal Reserve
Pretty heavy stuff huh? Speaks well of JFK. Well the aim of people like Hersh is to reduce it all to "Well, Allen Dulles did not like JFK having an affair with Exner." BTW, this is what I objected to in Twyman's book.
Excuse me: HA HA HA HA HA. Let em rest up. OK. HA HA HA HA HA again.
Dulles had so many affairs while he was married that he started to feel guilty about it. Know what he did? He bought CLover a mink stole whenever the guilt got to him. Must have been quite a packed closet.
So please. Don' t make me barf.
What Allen Dulles was really worried about was that Truman's editorial might have hinted that Harry understood that Vietnam was a prime issue that JFK was killed over. We have this in his own memo of the meeting. Which tells us what? You can't connect the dots on that one? I can.
Instead of reading Reeves' crazy book, or Madeleine Brown's, do me a favor--read Mosley 's book entitled Dulles. Then read Mangold's Cold Warrior.
You will then begin to understand the true treachery of these men.
Everyone knows about Mena. It was part of the whole illegal Iran/COntra scandal.
THe reason Starr did not go into it is easy to discern: Because if he did, the trail would lead back to the White House. THat is the kind of gutless hack Starr was.
Your other stuff about that money grubbing Gennifer Flowers, please.
See, you obviously do not understand the first thing about propaganda paradigms. That is why you were so gullible to swallow Scaife's.
When I first read Ruddy's phony report about the "murder" of FOster, I immediately understood what Ruddy had done. He had modeled his work on what the WC critics had done back in 1966-67. THat is, he was going to raise doubts about the handgun, the position of the body etc.
Except for one thing: as Lee later explained, it was all faulty data. Just the opposite of what the WC critics had done. THey had good data. Which the WC had buried or disguised.
ANd this is what I mean. To somehow equate the likes of Al Ruddy and Scaife with people like Sylvia Meagher and Marzani is bonkers. Its a world turned topsy turvy. ANd using someone like Larry Nichols as a witness is like using Brennan or Markham, or some of the people SHeridan interviewed in jail to use against Garrison. And if you want me to prove that, I will.
What you don' t understand is this: what people like Hersh and Reeves do is two things:
1.) THey want to cheapen who JFK is, in hopes that people will say, "Well the philanderer and marijuana smoker deserved what he got." ITs the same agenda the SS had with Hersh.
2.) THey want to distract from the real issues about the assassination. The real issues, as far as i am concerned were:
1. Vietnam
2. Cuba
3. Detente with Russia
4. Upcoming recognition of China
5. Federal Reserve
Pretty heavy stuff huh? Speaks well of JFK. Well the aim of people like Hersh is to reduce it all to "Well, Allen Dulles did not like JFK having an affair with Exner." BTW, this is what I objected to in Twyman's book.
Excuse me: HA HA HA HA HA. Let em rest up. OK. HA HA HA HA HA again.
Dulles had so many affairs while he was married that he started to feel guilty about it. Know what he did? He bought CLover a mink stole whenever the guilt got to him. Must have been quite a packed closet.
So please. Don' t make me barf.
What Allen Dulles was really worried about was that Truman's editorial might have hinted that Harry understood that Vietnam was a prime issue that JFK was killed over. We have this in his own memo of the meeting. Which tells us what? You can't connect the dots on that one? I can.
Instead of reading Reeves' crazy book, or Madeleine Brown's, do me a favor--read Mosley 's book entitled Dulles. Then read Mangold's Cold Warrior.
You will then begin to understand the true treachery of these men.