15-01-2011, 03:58 PM
The allusion to "no planes" qualifies as (what is known as) an appeal to popular
sentiments, since most of us have not studied the question and are inclined to
supposed that the position is absurd. That is the case with respect to many of
the most contentious issues in JFK, for example, where the fabrication of the
Zapruder film may seem implausible to those who haven't studied the evidence.
"Who's telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?" is a nice case in point.
Since there may be members of this forum who wonder what it means, which
is not what the phrase may be misinterpreted to mean, here are some points
that I would make about "no planes", even though there are others who take a
somewhat stronger stance, where Morgan speaks eloquently for himself on this
issue. I should say that it was because of Morgan that I was finally able to open
my mind to the possibility of video fakery on 9/11 just as the Z-film was faked.
THE MEANING OF "NO PLANES"
The phrase "no planes" in this context does not mean (or does not necessarily
mean) that there were LITERALLY no planes but rather as I use the phrase that
there are problems about the planes at each of the four alleged "crash sites":
* There is no evidence that Flight 93, a Boeing 757, crashed in Shanksville
* A Boeing 757 flew toward the Pentagon but then swerved and flew over it
* A flying something hit North Tower but does not appear to be a Boeing 767
* Whatever we see hit the South Tower appears to have involved video fakery
Since most of the discussion that follows concerns the South Tower, anyone
who wants more about the other alleged "crash sites" may want to review the
following resources:
* Killtown on Shanksville,
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2010/11/gue...-show.html
* Jim Fetzer, "What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon",
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/01/...tagon.html
* Leslie Raphael, "Jules Naudet's 9/11 Film was Staged"
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/naudet/raphael.htm
* Jim Fetzer, "New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Pro...9-132.html
Some addition sources about this may be found here:
No planes -- just manufactured videos
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/401.html
WTC No Plane Theory (Part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBpTWYUgvcM
9/11 No Plane Manifesto
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sElG-J3RlEs
sentiments, since most of us have not studied the question and are inclined to
supposed that the position is absurd. That is the case with respect to many of
the most contentious issues in JFK, for example, where the fabrication of the
Zapruder film may seem implausible to those who haven't studied the evidence.
"Who's telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?" is a nice case in point.
Since there may be members of this forum who wonder what it means, which
is not what the phrase may be misinterpreted to mean, here are some points
that I would make about "no planes", even though there are others who take a
somewhat stronger stance, where Morgan speaks eloquently for himself on this
issue. I should say that it was because of Morgan that I was finally able to open
my mind to the possibility of video fakery on 9/11 just as the Z-film was faked.
THE MEANING OF "NO PLANES"
The phrase "no planes" in this context does not mean (or does not necessarily
mean) that there were LITERALLY no planes but rather as I use the phrase that
there are problems about the planes at each of the four alleged "crash sites":
* There is no evidence that Flight 93, a Boeing 757, crashed in Shanksville
* A Boeing 757 flew toward the Pentagon but then swerved and flew over it
* A flying something hit North Tower but does not appear to be a Boeing 767
* Whatever we see hit the South Tower appears to have involved video fakery
Since most of the discussion that follows concerns the South Tower, anyone
who wants more about the other alleged "crash sites" may want to review the
following resources:
* Killtown on Shanksville,
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2010/11/gue...-show.html
* Jim Fetzer, "What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon",
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/01/...tagon.html
* Leslie Raphael, "Jules Naudet's 9/11 Film was Staged"
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/naudet/raphael.htm
* Jim Fetzer, "New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Pro...9-132.html
Some addition sources about this may be found here:
No planes -- just manufactured videos
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/401.html
WTC No Plane Theory (Part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBpTWYUgvcM
9/11 No Plane Manifesto
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sElG-J3RlEs
David Guyatt Wrote:Gentlemen, please keep the discussion pointed at the facts and avoid the tendency to engage in ad homs at all costs.
Thanks.