17-01-2011, 01:38 AM
Morgan Reynolds Wrote:Does anyone else on this thread detect Drago's principal weapon: argument by intimidation? Such is not an argument of course, but rather a means to bypass reason and evidence by psychological pressure. Examples:
a) Your inability -- or is it unwillingness -- to see it tells us all we need to know about your intellectual acuity and dedication to truth.
b) Resort to "automatic" knee-jerk responses to your hearts content. When you can demonstrate the discipline and learning to go beyond such childish responses, get back to me.
c) The onus is on you to find the Evica/Drago model of the assassination and comment cogently upon it. You dare not. You bore me. And you reveal your limitations with every word you type.
d) Until you can demonstrate more than a pathetically pedestrian appreciation of the JFK conspiracy, you are relegated to the peanut gallery.
And so on.
It's all about the Drago superior intellect and the inferior learning and capacity of others who use their minds and come to different conclusions, defensible conclusions.
I've not heard Drago and company ID the principals in the assassination. And I doubt they ever will except to refer to "forces, the "puppet masters," powers that be, shadow government, international bankers, etc. They never name persons and offer their evidence to back it up, nor do I expect they ever will. Welcome to the matrix.
When I joined this forum, I was attracted by the "Deep Politics Forum" name alone, and a thread on Nelson was attractive if only because I was fascinated with the book and sought out to find informed criticism and assessment of evidence, praise, shortcomings, etc. Yet critics have showed me NADA thus far. I hoped to find rational assessment and debate about the evidence for and against Nelson's thesis of LBJ as the mastermind of JFK's assassination. That hope has been dashed.
This is probably a preview, unfortunately, of 9/11 research 47 years hence: honest researchers vexed by a den of vipers blocking and smearing legitimate hypotheses and empirical research.
You are not addressing a colleague in the Bush Administration.
Peddle your self-serving drivel somewhere else.
Jim Fetzer broke my heart.
You ... you are a transparent naif and a posturing fool.
No longer address me.
Go cuddle with the failing Fetzer.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene