17-01-2011, 03:24 AM
The first domestic assassination is the toughest.
LBJ announced he would not run on March 31, 1968. No way he could have been nominated in the D party much less elected. But as long as he remained prez, his JFK co-conspirators (Hoover, Dulles, Phillips, the usual suspects) had a free hand to knock off any "inconvenient" opposition leader given that LBJ was more "mobbed up" than any leader in the history of the western world. LBJ would have had little interest in reining this in unless he feared crimes being traced back to him, but he had little power as a truly-controlled mega-lame duck. He was in pure protective mode. So the shooter(s) got the signal to "do" MLK on April 4, 1968 from...J. Edgar? or...?, perhaps as many claim because of MLK's opposition to the Vietnam war and the MIC or just being an annoying, charismatic black man.
RFK follows on June 5 (died on 6th) most likely based on fear that RFK would open a real investigation of his brother's assassination, quickly bring the war to an end, and assorted threats to the PTB, etc. Of course, LBJ would have motive for (benefit from) RFK's death. LBJ wouldn't want any motivated "troublemaker" to succeed him as prez, but that aside, the PTB appears important in engineering a succession of establishment jerks beyond LBJ's stay in D.C. like Nixon (or HHH for that matter), Ford, interrupted by outsider Reagan, I believe, but Bush-Baker-crime-family attacked, then played like a fiddle by Bush-Baker. Then we had GWHB put in the presidency outright, followed by CFR controlled a**holes "W" and BHO.
None of this has any implication for or against the hypothesis of LBJ as central culprit in JFK's assassination.
LBJ announced he would not run on March 31, 1968. No way he could have been nominated in the D party much less elected. But as long as he remained prez, his JFK co-conspirators (Hoover, Dulles, Phillips, the usual suspects) had a free hand to knock off any "inconvenient" opposition leader given that LBJ was more "mobbed up" than any leader in the history of the western world. LBJ would have had little interest in reining this in unless he feared crimes being traced back to him, but he had little power as a truly-controlled mega-lame duck. He was in pure protective mode. So the shooter(s) got the signal to "do" MLK on April 4, 1968 from...J. Edgar? or...?, perhaps as many claim because of MLK's opposition to the Vietnam war and the MIC or just being an annoying, charismatic black man.
RFK follows on June 5 (died on 6th) most likely based on fear that RFK would open a real investigation of his brother's assassination, quickly bring the war to an end, and assorted threats to the PTB, etc. Of course, LBJ would have motive for (benefit from) RFK's death. LBJ wouldn't want any motivated "troublemaker" to succeed him as prez, but that aside, the PTB appears important in engineering a succession of establishment jerks beyond LBJ's stay in D.C. like Nixon (or HHH for that matter), Ford, interrupted by outsider Reagan, I believe, but Bush-Baker-crime-family attacked, then played like a fiddle by Bush-Baker. Then we had GWHB put in the presidency outright, followed by CFR controlled a**holes "W" and BHO.
None of this has any implication for or against the hypothesis of LBJ as central culprit in JFK's assassination.