21-01-2011, 04:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-01-2011, 04:46 PM by Charles Drago.)
For me, a major sheepdipping of False Sponsors would make sense. I don't object to the premise of Brown's story.
Alas, this one is too theatrical. It is too grandiose. The incrimination of the Facilitators among those at the alleged party surely took place -- but most likely on smaller stages and in less grand fashion.
And the only source for the story is a woman whose vulnerabilities to manipulation can only be guessed at.
The notion that this meeting was convened so that a final vote on the assassination could be taken is too ludicruous to entertain. In order for this to have taken place, the masterpiece conspiracy would have had to be constructed along the lines of a high school civics class exercise.
And the masterful conspirators would have had to agree to rendezvous at virtually the scene of the crime.
Further, and at the risk of opening old wounds, I am obliged to note in a spirit of collegial academic discourse that support for this story from Messrs. Nelson and Morrow is tantamount to a Politburo vote in support of Uncle Joe.
If we are now reduced to citing the likes of these failed "scholars" (in one case an all too successful disinformationalist, in the other his sexually obsessed tout*) to bolster our work, we might as well give it all up and apply for Bilderberg membership.
For as long as I have the strength to put words to paper (cyber and foolscap), I shall not allow such vile product and its originators/vessels to be associated positively with the name of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
________________________________________
*Before anyone gets their knickers in a knot over the use of this language ... think about it. The strong, documented case for the former characterization has been made ad nauseam and stands unrefuted. The case for the latter is repeatedly -- and, thankfully, elsewhere -- self-made.
Alas, this one is too theatrical. It is too grandiose. The incrimination of the Facilitators among those at the alleged party surely took place -- but most likely on smaller stages and in less grand fashion.
And the only source for the story is a woman whose vulnerabilities to manipulation can only be guessed at.
The notion that this meeting was convened so that a final vote on the assassination could be taken is too ludicruous to entertain. In order for this to have taken place, the masterpiece conspiracy would have had to be constructed along the lines of a high school civics class exercise.
And the masterful conspirators would have had to agree to rendezvous at virtually the scene of the crime.
Further, and at the risk of opening old wounds, I am obliged to note in a spirit of collegial academic discourse that support for this story from Messrs. Nelson and Morrow is tantamount to a Politburo vote in support of Uncle Joe.
If we are now reduced to citing the likes of these failed "scholars" (in one case an all too successful disinformationalist, in the other his sexually obsessed tout*) to bolster our work, we might as well give it all up and apply for Bilderberg membership.
For as long as I have the strength to put words to paper (cyber and foolscap), I shall not allow such vile product and its originators/vessels to be associated positively with the name of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
________________________________________
*Before anyone gets their knickers in a knot over the use of this language ... think about it. The strong, documented case for the former characterization has been made ad nauseam and stands unrefuted. The case for the latter is repeatedly -- and, thankfully, elsewhere -- self-made.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene