25-01-2011, 09:38 PM
Jim DiEugenio referred to Phillips' part in Mexico City, and we know from Newman and Pease of Angleton's manipulation of Oswald's file.
The use of the term virus relates to CIA's creation of Oswald as agent of Kostikov, which he obviously was not.
Hoover's marginalia regarding having been fooled by CIA reflects he was onto the ruse and not amused.
Enter Nosenko whom I don't see as "sent" in the way Chicago "don't want nobody nobody sent."
Angleton was caught with his gambit on the floor and spent fourteen hundred days pouting until Helms stamped his foot.
And priceless is the Angleton two-year-old tantrum in re "not privy to who struck John."
The use of the term virus relates to CIA's creation of Oswald as agent of Kostikov, which he obviously was not.
Hoover's marginalia regarding having been fooled by CIA reflects he was onto the ruse and not amused.
Enter Nosenko whom I don't see as "sent" in the way Chicago "don't want nobody nobody sent."
Angleton was caught with his gambit on the floor and spent fourteen hundred days pouting until Helms stamped his foot.
And priceless is the Angleton two-year-old tantrum in re "not privy to who struck John."