The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 9/11

[Jan Klimkowski]

Thanks for this, Jan.

Your use of the model supports George Michael's early contention that it is viable for most intel ops in general and deep political ops in particular.

Your example is fascinating insofar as you describe the Mechanics as being convinced that they were both Sponsors and Facilitators.

I believe that many of the JFK Facilitators were encouraged to believe that they also belonged on the Sponsor level. In other words, they were played for fools.

As for the JFK mechanics -- members of the responsible shooting teams -- I believe but cannot prove that they labored under no such illusion. These people were pros -- the best in the business. They could not have cared less about the Sponsors' identities.

The Irish National Liberation Army (INLA) was an ideologically tight group, with a political "wing", and a military "wing" which was prepared to conduct political assassination. For instance, it was the INLA who assassinated Thatcher mentor, and deep state player, Airey Neave, in 1979 in the Palace of Westminster.

As such the INLA was a "terrorist" group with an established history of political assassinaiton according to the dominant political narrative.

So, a political assassination committed by the INLA would immediately be framed by MSM as a terrorist action, with no further questions asked.

As such, an assassination performed by this "terrorist" group represented perfect cover and plausible deniability for any agency wanting to terminate an individual they considered dangerous.

Now if that dangerous individual was already a potential target for the "terrorist" group, or could be transformed into such by selective leaking or fabricating of information, then it may be that the "terrorist" group would hatch its own terror plot, for reasons consistent with its own ideology.

In this speculative model, then, the task of the Sponsors becomes to Facilitate the assassination with invisible hands.

A group such as the INLA would never accept a hit contract from British Military Intelligence.

However, British Military Intelligence could ensure that certain things happened - a stand down of security guards, an undetected hole in a key piece of infrastructure, the smuggling of weapons into a high security prison - that the INLA assassins themselves would be unlikely to be able to deliver. The deep state Sponsor would be able to achieve this by using Facilitators such as prison guards.

Again, in this speculative model, the Mechanics must never become aware of the deep state Sponsorship of such an operation. Which means that the Facilitators would probably also be kept largely in the dark, unaware of the full picture.

Charles - I agree that this working hypothesis and exploration of the Mechanic/Facilitator/Sponsor model has considerable implications.

The assassins who murdered JFK were most probably professsional hitmen used to taking a job for pay.

The assassins who murdered Billy Wright were ideologically driven "terrorists", who would kill for their beliefs but most likely not for money.

And so we get to 9/11...

The alleged Mechanics were members of an established "terrorist" group who would kill for their beliefs but most likely not for money.

Which leads to....