15-02-2011, 04:02 PM
The only problem I have is with you, Charles.
I used the W. W. Norton 1991 paperback editon of John Marks' book, and the rapid induction hypnosis experiment is discussed on pp. 202-3, and I never said that the note was numbered on p. 244, only said that it was at the bottom of the page.
The only addition I made to what was provided is the claim that the subject was apparently LHO, "...a low-level agent whom the Soviets had apparently doubled." (p. 203)
Now how many such agents did CIA have available in a Mexico City motel in July 1963 with such a contested status, and James Angleton's Counterintelligence Staff in Washington wanted so hypnotized?
The only possible agent I can think of with this questionable doubled status is Oswald, especially since you mention him in connection with Yuri Nosenko who "...said that the KGB had no interest in Oswald." (p. 154)
You have a most limited view of research - never go with what the suspects somehow disclose!
And, as expected, regarding other findings, you attack my methods rather than the offers and the messages.
Don't expect anything more from me, as I consider you a total waste of time.
I used the W. W. Norton 1991 paperback editon of John Marks' book, and the rapid induction hypnosis experiment is discussed on pp. 202-3, and I never said that the note was numbered on p. 244, only said that it was at the bottom of the page.
The only addition I made to what was provided is the claim that the subject was apparently LHO, "...a low-level agent whom the Soviets had apparently doubled." (p. 203)
Now how many such agents did CIA have available in a Mexico City motel in July 1963 with such a contested status, and James Angleton's Counterintelligence Staff in Washington wanted so hypnotized?
The only possible agent I can think of with this questionable doubled status is Oswald, especially since you mention him in connection with Yuri Nosenko who "...said that the KGB had no interest in Oswald." (p. 154)
You have a most limited view of research - never go with what the suspects somehow disclose!
And, as expected, regarding other findings, you attack my methods rather than the offers and the messages.
Don't expect anything more from me, as I consider you a total waste of time.