23-02-2011, 06:23 AM
I personally feel what JFK was doing was presenting the offenses of communism in such a way as to make the comparisons to how it also applied to the CIA unavoidable. Hey, it was no secret what JFK was doing at the time.
What I found amazing in Unspeakable was the ingenious device Pope JohnXXIII used in his intervention in Pacem In Terris. The Pope did a similar thing as JFK and I think Douglass is hinting JFK might have followed his lead with some clever psychology. Knowing how pompous the Russian generals were the Pope deliberately inserted a similar case of double entendre where he knew the Russians, not being able to admit it applied to them, would immediately apply it to the US and tell their people the Pope is criticizing the US. And the US generals, not wanting to assume it was them the Pope was listing the faults of, would assume it was the Russians the Pope was referring to. It was a real artwork of a sincere yet craftily clever piece of word work that then made each side, at the same, time think they were being validated by the Pope. That satisfied the egotistical need of both sides and put both sides in a consenting mood at the same time. The moves toward the test ban treaty and disarmament soon followed. It was a masterful act of diplomacy with huge world scale consequences.
When Kennedy tried his Pacem In Terris in the form of the American University speech it didn't have the same effect and probably ended up getting him killed.
Charles will cringe, however I have found more hints that the change of the vital paragraph between the NSAM 263-73 documents was almost certainly done as a covert strategy. I believe a very sinister plot was happening where Oswald was going to be claimed to have shot Kennedy because he changed his word on Viet Nam as seen in NSAM 273. Remember, the letter to the Soviet embassy showed Oswald knew that the man in the Cuban consulate was going to be transferred. Investigators say they can't figure out the meaning of this. Well the meaning could be that there was a plan to show Oswald was privy to secret information. Greg might have much more bang to the buck than he realizes. There could have been a plan to show Oswald was deeper than people thought, as shown by his knowledge of the transfer, and shot Kennedy in reaction to his secret knowledge Kennedy had betrayed Khrushchev and reversed his policy on Viet Nam.
Knowing what we know about CIA/FBI manipulation and alteration of evidence it makes sense to me that there was very likely a plan to use Kennedy's secret communications with Khrushchev to show Kennedy had lost his mind and gone into secret cooperation with the enemy. This would automatically validate any Executive Action as a reasonable response - but most importantly an act of law. And that's important because I'm beginning to understand that the outrageous acts associated with this assassination had to have some kind of rational justification. I'm beginning to see a pattern in the conspiracy that suggests these people considered they were acting under some kind of valid legal definition.
I think Greg doesn't realize he may have uncovered much more than he thinks and that the real purpose of the NSAM 273 document manipulation wasn't just to allow escalation in Viet Nam but was a clever way to associate it with the reason for the assassination. Before Charles questions this (if he does) he should consider the other similar 'literary' devices seen in this assassination elsewhere.
Oswald is in close contact with the Russians in Mexico; He shows signs of having inside knowledge of communist internal affairs; JFK is set-up as having betrayed the Soviet premier he is in secret communication with by breaking his word on Viet Nam; Defector and traitor Lee Harvey Oswald, who is in direct contact with KGB, then assassinates Kennedy.
Like the many Oswald doubles running around Dallas framing Oswald, this plan was never executed (but it was available).
.
What I found amazing in Unspeakable was the ingenious device Pope JohnXXIII used in his intervention in Pacem In Terris. The Pope did a similar thing as JFK and I think Douglass is hinting JFK might have followed his lead with some clever psychology. Knowing how pompous the Russian generals were the Pope deliberately inserted a similar case of double entendre where he knew the Russians, not being able to admit it applied to them, would immediately apply it to the US and tell their people the Pope is criticizing the US. And the US generals, not wanting to assume it was them the Pope was listing the faults of, would assume it was the Russians the Pope was referring to. It was a real artwork of a sincere yet craftily clever piece of word work that then made each side, at the same, time think they were being validated by the Pope. That satisfied the egotistical need of both sides and put both sides in a consenting mood at the same time. The moves toward the test ban treaty and disarmament soon followed. It was a masterful act of diplomacy with huge world scale consequences.
When Kennedy tried his Pacem In Terris in the form of the American University speech it didn't have the same effect and probably ended up getting him killed.
Charles will cringe, however I have found more hints that the change of the vital paragraph between the NSAM 263-73 documents was almost certainly done as a covert strategy. I believe a very sinister plot was happening where Oswald was going to be claimed to have shot Kennedy because he changed his word on Viet Nam as seen in NSAM 273. Remember, the letter to the Soviet embassy showed Oswald knew that the man in the Cuban consulate was going to be transferred. Investigators say they can't figure out the meaning of this. Well the meaning could be that there was a plan to show Oswald was privy to secret information. Greg might have much more bang to the buck than he realizes. There could have been a plan to show Oswald was deeper than people thought, as shown by his knowledge of the transfer, and shot Kennedy in reaction to his secret knowledge Kennedy had betrayed Khrushchev and reversed his policy on Viet Nam.
Knowing what we know about CIA/FBI manipulation and alteration of evidence it makes sense to me that there was very likely a plan to use Kennedy's secret communications with Khrushchev to show Kennedy had lost his mind and gone into secret cooperation with the enemy. This would automatically validate any Executive Action as a reasonable response - but most importantly an act of law. And that's important because I'm beginning to understand that the outrageous acts associated with this assassination had to have some kind of rational justification. I'm beginning to see a pattern in the conspiracy that suggests these people considered they were acting under some kind of valid legal definition.
I think Greg doesn't realize he may have uncovered much more than he thinks and that the real purpose of the NSAM 273 document manipulation wasn't just to allow escalation in Viet Nam but was a clever way to associate it with the reason for the assassination. Before Charles questions this (if he does) he should consider the other similar 'literary' devices seen in this assassination elsewhere.
Oswald is in close contact with the Russians in Mexico; He shows signs of having inside knowledge of communist internal affairs; JFK is set-up as having betrayed the Soviet premier he is in secret communication with by breaking his word on Viet Nam; Defector and traitor Lee Harvey Oswald, who is in direct contact with KGB, then assassinates Kennedy.
Like the many Oswald doubles running around Dallas framing Oswald, this plan was never executed (but it was available).
.