07-02-2009, 12:28 PM
To answer various questions I do have a deposition given by Frank G in a tobacco case which is quite damning in that it relates to a RJ Reynolds documents which outlines his job responsibilities )expressed as "Principal accountabilities"). Number one on the list was, and I quote: "Efficiently provide the technical expertise necessary for the company to combat anti-tobacco claims".
Also, Frank G's family name was used openly in the deposition and other literature, but I am withholding this for the time being as it would embarrass some one known to many of us here. And although that someone could do with a severe embarrassing, I'm not sure I should do that.
His move from R J Reynolds to the law firm was a tactic. Basically he was a RJR man though and through and retained his position at RJR. He also worked in temporary positions with other big tobacco law firms for much the same reasons, so far as I can gather anyway.
Also, Frank G's family name was used openly in the deposition and other literature, but I am withholding this for the time being as it would embarrass some one known to many of us here. And although that someone could do with a severe embarrassing, I'm not sure I should do that.
His move from R J Reynolds to the law firm was a tactic. Basically he was a RJR man though and through and retained his position at RJR. He also worked in temporary positions with other big tobacco law firms for much the same reasons, so far as I can gather anyway.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14