06-03-2011, 09:00 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:[N.B. Not exactly what I'd have written, but has many very good points!!!! - worth reading.]
This is why there was no airframe identification from the recovered parts. Why the airframes alledged to have crashed were, according to official airframe databases, still in use for some years after 911. Why the 'hijackers' never actually got on the planes that day, why all the 'phone calls' were faked, why the autopsy reports have so many discrepancies, why the details of where the flights departed from and if all of them even existed that day, why the 'recovered flight data recorder' data is so bodgey and took so long to be released, why the government employed forum shills are so strident with their 'no planes, Pentagon missile, WTC nukes, holograms, beams from space' and all the other garbage disinformation and sidetracks...
I agree with the author on this point. Advocating these far-out theories damages the "truth movement" as a whole. They make it far too easy to throw the baby out with the bath-water. I see it as panning for gold. The pan is full of dirt, with the possibility of a few flecks of gold. It takes a long time to sift the dirt out. If people keep on pouring dirt into the pan, those gold flecks are never going to be found.
Quote:The planes that impacted were old 737s with terminal guidance hardware installed by Dov's System Planning Corp. Flying on inertial navigation waypoint data uploaded via the transponder channel, and switching over to IR guidance on final approach. Painted up to look like the planes they were supposed to be.
An interesting theory I've never really looked into in detail before. Have to say I think it would take more of a lick of paint to make a 737 look like a 757.
CITs interviews re the Pentagon are certainly interesting. The main problem with I have with them is two-fold. Firstly, they rely almost entirely on witness interviews made years after the event. Secondly, they discredit any witnesses that don't support a south of CITGO approach, and Pentagon flyover. They have to be applauded for at least putting the groundwork in and getting out there and speaking to people on the ground.