27-03-2011, 06:09 PM
CNN did an anniversary piece on Hinckley's shooting of Reagan last night. Of course, like their Lennon anniversary piece, they never mentioned anything about mind control hypnosis.
What I got the most from the program was CIA probably studied their Kennedy Assassination and tweaked their Lone Nut process in order to increase the appearance of guilt in their patsies. What I saw in the CNN piece is that CIA looked at the flaws in their framing of Oswald and refined them by making sure Hinckley was seen as definitely being psychotic in his delusional love affair with Jody Foster. Few people who watch the CNN piece are probably aware that they are seeing a very evil and diabolical CIA program in making Hinckley appear as a dangerous Lone Nut. Once Hinckley was induced by mind control to act out on his imaginary love affair with Foster he would successfully create a paper trail to convince the public he was a dangerous psychotic. In my mind this was a process his mind control think tank handlers developed in order to compensate for failures in the Lee Harvey Oswald Lone Nut scenario.
In the case of Chapman, CIA's refinement of their patsy framing technique came in the form of open claims of imaginary meanings in the book 'Catcher In The Rye'. This was yet another creepy spook adjustment of their mind control Manchurian Candidate process after studying their successes and failures in the Kennedy Assassination. Some of the best 'evidence' for these CIA hypnotic assassin programs is looking at how the nuances of each case conform to the overall pattern of such operations. There's no doubt CIA continued using this method because of its functional success in the famous assassinations of the 1960's. When you apply the pattern of progressive development of the technique in the Chapman and Hinckley cases it fits perfectly. They removed the doubts by placing their assassin right up front without any co-conspirators. They also created less doubt of their guilt by enhancing the psychotic nature of their motives. In my opinion you are looking at the progressive development of the technique in this pattern.
What I got the most from the program was CIA probably studied their Kennedy Assassination and tweaked their Lone Nut process in order to increase the appearance of guilt in their patsies. What I saw in the CNN piece is that CIA looked at the flaws in their framing of Oswald and refined them by making sure Hinckley was seen as definitely being psychotic in his delusional love affair with Jody Foster. Few people who watch the CNN piece are probably aware that they are seeing a very evil and diabolical CIA program in making Hinckley appear as a dangerous Lone Nut. Once Hinckley was induced by mind control to act out on his imaginary love affair with Foster he would successfully create a paper trail to convince the public he was a dangerous psychotic. In my mind this was a process his mind control think tank handlers developed in order to compensate for failures in the Lee Harvey Oswald Lone Nut scenario.
In the case of Chapman, CIA's refinement of their patsy framing technique came in the form of open claims of imaginary meanings in the book 'Catcher In The Rye'. This was yet another creepy spook adjustment of their mind control Manchurian Candidate process after studying their successes and failures in the Kennedy Assassination. Some of the best 'evidence' for these CIA hypnotic assassin programs is looking at how the nuances of each case conform to the overall pattern of such operations. There's no doubt CIA continued using this method because of its functional success in the famous assassinations of the 1960's. When you apply the pattern of progressive development of the technique in the Chapman and Hinckley cases it fits perfectly. They removed the doubts by placing their assassin right up front without any co-conspirators. They also created less doubt of their guilt by enhancing the psychotic nature of their motives. In my opinion you are looking at the progressive development of the technique in this pattern.