04-05-2011, 08:41 PM
Trowbridge H. Ford Wrote:Right Jan, your complaints about Fetzer are most timely but he has always been in the business of getting those interested in going along with his deceptions, whether it be the JFk assassination, 9/11 or whatever.
My best experience with him was when he sent me an unsolicited copy of The Taking Of America, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague which Fetzer sent me on April 3, 1998 in the hope of coopting me to give up my theory about Nixon being the ringleader of the JFK assassination, and also an unsolicited copy of Assassination Science in the hope to getting me to go along with his deep deceptions.
In the article on p. 78, Sprague said about my work on Compuiters and Automation and other sources: "Whether Nixon was directly involved in the PCG'S planning for the assassination is still open to question, although one researcher believes that he was."
No efforts by Fetzer to get me to change my mind have succeeded in the slightest bit.
The professor is apparently the government's leading spook.
.
Baloney. Fetzer is correct about FACTS 98 percent of the time.
He is wrong only on two minor subjects...JVB and CMH.
I agree that he should refrain from criticizing other researchers
just because they do not see matters as clearly as he does.
Fetzer is a true patriot. The same cannot be said of all his critics.
Jack