04-05-2011, 09:55 PM
Let's see. I sent this guy a copy of "The Taking of America: 1-2-3" and even a copy of ASSASSINATION SCIENCE (1998), to which there are eleven (11) contributors, including David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., Robert B. Livingston, M.D., Charles Crenshaw, M.D., Brad Kizzia, J.D., Roy Schaeffer and Mike Pincher, J.D., and others still. So what possible "deep deceptions" was I attempting to "get [him] to go along with"? that the X-rays had been altered? that another brain had been substituted for that of JFK? that there were multiple indications that the Zapruder film had been faked? And who is this guy, anyway? I do him a good turn and he responds with complete and utter rubbish? And the moderators pretend they don't notice, because they are so concerned that I implied that someone I admire was not "up to speed" about the death of Osama bin Laden? What's going on here? I expect more even-handed treatment at the DEEP POLITICS FORUM. And why would I -- or anyone else, for that matter -- give a damn about what this guy thinks? Who cares? But I expect more from the moderators.
Trowbridge H. Ford Wrote:Right Jan, your complaints about Fetzer are most timely but he has always been in the business of getting those interested in going along with his deceptions, whether it be the JFk assassination, 9/11 or whatever.
My best experience with him was when he sent me an unsolicited copy of The Taking Of America, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague which Fetzer sent me on April 3, 1998 in the hope of coopting me to give up my theory about Nixon being the ringleader of the JFK assassination, and also an unsolicited copy of Assassination Science in the hope to getting me to go along with his deep deceptions.
In the article on p. 78, Sprague said about my work on Compuiters and Automation and other sources: "Whether Nixon was directly involved in the PCG'S planning for the assassination is still open to question, although one researcher believes that he was."
No efforts by Fetzer to get me to change my mind have succeeded in the slightest bit.
The professor is apparently the government's leading spook.
.