05-05-2011, 02:08 AM
Ed Jewett Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Trowbridge H. Ford Wrote:Right Jan, your complaints about Fetzer are most timely but he has always been in the business of getting those interested in going along with his deceptions, whether it be the JFk assassination, 9/11 or whatever.
My best experience with him was when he sent me an unsolicited copy of The Taking Of America, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague which Fetzer sent me on April 3, 1998 in the hope of coopting me to give up my theory about Nixon being the ringleader of the JFK assassination, and also an unsolicited copy of Assassination Science in the hope to getting me to go along with his deep deceptions.
In the article on p. 78, Sprague said about my work on Compuiters and Automation and other sources: "Whether Nixon was directly involved in the PCG'S planning for the assassination is still open to question, although one researcher believes that he was."
No efforts by Fetzer to get me to change my mind have succeeded in the slightest bit.
The professor is apparently the government's leading spook.
.
Baloney. Fetzer is correct about FACTS 98 percent of the time.
He is wrong only on two minor subjects...JVB and CMH.
I agree that he should refrain from criticizing other researchers
just because they do not see matters as clearly as he does.
Fetzer is a true patriot. The same cannot be said of all his critics.
Jack
Totally unrelated to the Fetzer debate, or the OBL/Obama debate, or any other debate, perhaps a thread should be started in which "a true patriot" can be defined so we can ascertain and discern whether we ourselves meet the criteria.
I had a similar discussion elsewhere with someone else who was ranting about collapse and militia and such stuff and I asked him how one might know, in the middle of such chaos, how one had made contact with those who -- armed with long-range sniper rifles and such -- deemed themselves to be on the right side, whether they were friend (or foe). Were we to wear feathers in our hat-bands, upside-down tarot cards on our foreheads, insignia on our shoulders, or simply to transmit some secret signal like the hjck codes from our iPhone transponders?
A "true" patriot is one whose only agenda is TRUTH, regardless
of what the truth may be. A "true" patriot thinks for himself and does
not represent any governmental or political entity. A "true" patriot
has his eyes wide open and his brain in gear running on all cylinders
to examine all viewpoints and facts objectively, without regard to
other views. A "true" patriot is not a "superpatriot" who blindly follows
an extreme viewpoint established by others. A "true" patriot can discern
phoniness in persons and facts, and is well grounded in information and
facts. A "true" patriot can assimilate and compare "official stories",
propaganda, and documentation to determine truth. A "true" patriot
loves his country, but recogizes its faults when it is wrong. A "true"
patriot is more intelligent and in better control of facts than the ordinary
patriotic average citizen.
That describes many researchers I know...but I must say that not all
researchers are "true" patriots.
Jack