15-05-2011, 12:41 AM
Well, I hope you can look past my not meeting your "engineer or a physicist" qualifications for discussing the issue, particularly seeing as how you don't even quite meet it yourself.
Anyway, do you agree that Bazzant's claims of crush-down before crush-up violate Newton's third law? I ask because that is in large part what Gage and others are referring to when they say the official explanation for how the towers came down violates the laws of physics, and if you actually disagree with their contention, I hope you might explain why.
As for your own hypothesis, have you attempted to produce any semblance of experimental confirmation to test it? Bazzant could have easily debunked himself if only he had done that, yet here we are nearly a decade latter and our government still references him to explain how the towers came down.
Anyway, do you agree that Bazzant's claims of crush-down before crush-up violate Newton's third law? I ask because that is in large part what Gage and others are referring to when they say the official explanation for how the towers came down violates the laws of physics, and if you actually disagree with their contention, I hope you might explain why.
As for your own hypothesis, have you attempted to produce any semblance of experimental confirmation to test it? Bazzant could have easily debunked himself if only he had done that, yet here we are nearly a decade latter and our government still references him to explain how the towers came down.