16-05-2011, 11:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-05-2011, 11:36 PM by Kyle Burnett.)
Yeah, that was my guess, but I couldn't rule out the possibility that you might have been someone else who posts less and hence I hadn't run across over there. Anyway, in regard to your previous post:
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:...and to most engineers who study this it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck so it IS a duck and that duck is a progressive floor failure from over loading.So where can one find other examples of this supposed duck? Again, I've seen simulations of top-down building collapses, but none that come down anywhere nearly as quickly and completely as the towers did. Most engineers can agree on how many angels can dance on the head of a pin for all I care; but absent any semblance of experimental confirmation, you've got nothing to prove your claims of ducks are anything more than a snipe hunt.