17-05-2011, 03:00 PM
Kyle Burnett Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Orling cannot present us with one case of TOP DOWN COLLAPSE,Wood can't present us with one case of a directed energy device producing effects anything like what happened to the towers either. Hence neither rightly have a theory in the scientific sense, just hypotheses. To rightly be considered a theory would require passing the test of falsification through experimentation, and I'm quite sure both those pushing gravitational collapse and DEW hypotheses will never come anywhere close to accomplishing that.
or he would have by now. It is simply his "theory"...ducks or no
ducks, snipes or no snipes.
Wood clearly presents theories as theories. Orling presents theories as facts.
Jack