18-05-2011, 02:52 AM
Mr. Lewis,
Why did the south tower come down first? It's damage was lower and more asymmetrical for one thing. Seems as if the structural failure in phase I caused a rapid load redistribution and an asymmetrical one which led to the top not having support on the south side and so it began to drop AND rotate.
But we don't know what happened in Phase I and so its speculation to explain why the south tower's top failed in less time than the north tower.
Do you think "they" planned it that way? Why?
Why did the south tower come down first? It's damage was lower and more asymmetrical for one thing. Seems as if the structural failure in phase I caused a rapid load redistribution and an asymmetrical one which led to the top not having support on the south side and so it began to drop AND rotate.
But we don't know what happened in Phase I and so its speculation to explain why the south tower's top failed in less time than the north tower.
Do you think "they" planned it that way? Why?