19-05-2011, 12:45 AM
Well...maybe I'm just too much of a simple East Texas country boy to be able to use anything than common sense in investigating this thing. The way I see it, the only way that WTC 2 would come down first would be that the detonating charges were set up to go off in that building first. But, that's just simple common sense, which for some reason, doesn't seem to go over very well here. By the way...what theory would you apply to the destruction of WTC 7??
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Mr. Lewis,
Why did the south tower come down first? It's damage was lower and more asymmetrical for one thing. Seems as if the structural failure in phase I caused a rapid load redistribution and an asymmetrical one which led to the top not having support on the south side and so it began to drop AND rotate.
But we don't know what happened in Phase I and so its speculation to explain why the south tower's top failed in less time than the north tower.
Do you think "they" planned it that way? Why?
"Logic is all there is, and all there is must be logical."
"Truth is logic, and logic is truth."
"In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely." - Hunter S. Thompson
"A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on. A psychotic is a guy who's just found out what's going on." - William S. Burroughs
"Truth is logic, and logic is truth."
"In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely." - Hunter S. Thompson
"A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on. A psychotic is a guy who's just found out what's going on." - William S. Burroughs