21-05-2011, 01:38 AM
Strauss-Kahn and the CIA's Frank G. Wisner: Another Democracy Destabilization Act by the CIA?
Posted on May 20, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
UPDATE 2: In the original article I mention Jon Stewart's ambush of Rod Blagojevich in service to the banking interests. Ironically, fake "progressive" Jon Stewart did the exact same thing last night, attacking those who would dare not convict DSK in the press before the man has a chance to defend himself at trial. Perhaps Jon forgot to mention that his brother is a Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Americas Equities of the UBS Investment Bank, one of the very same institutions that would have suffered tremendously had DSK restructured Greece's debt. So Jon has a personal family interest in making sure DSK is tried in the court of public opinion and there is no denying that.
I have always said that Jon Stewart is a fraud, a fake "liberal", and a mouthpiece for the globalist banking cartel, this just goes to prove it even more.
UPDATE: Case in point, the "progressive" media outlet, AlterNet has 2 stories about DSK today… the first lumps DSK in with the Governator and Newt, and the second praises the victim and openly convicts the accused based on absolutely no evidence prior to his trial. So much for innocent until proven guilty when the CIA gets involved.
Schwarzenegger, DSK, and Gingrich: Do We Have Psychopaths Misruling Our World?
Accusing DSK of Sexual Assault Took Guts
-
Here's a little more information about the Struass-Kahn case. What do Strauss-Kahn's recent history with Ireland and Sarkozy's family ties to the CIA have to do with African chamber maids in New York? Inquiring minds want to know.
Apparently during the Irish crisis, Strauss-Kahn had put together a plan with Irish leaders to reduce their debt by a considerable amount by devaluing unguaranteed bonds, effectively making global banks pay for some of their own "stupidity". The Irish loved the plan, Tim Geithner did not. Mike Whitney over at Global Research explains it:
"In fact, he started mucking around in other stuff, too, like when he intervened on behalf of Irish taxpayers, trying to protect them at the expense of foreign bondholders. That's a big "No no" in banker's world. They keep a list of "people who count", and taxpayers are not on that list. Here's an excerpt from the Irish Times:
"Ireland's Last Stand began less shambolically than you might expect. The IMF, which believes that lenders should pay for their stupidity before it has to reach into its pocket, presented the Irish with a plan to haircut €30 billion of unguaranteed bonds by two-thirds on average. (Irish finance minister) Lenihan was overjoyed, according to a source who was there, telling the IMF team: "You are Ireland's salvation."
The deal was torpedoed from an unexpected direction. At a conference call with the G7 finance ministers, the haircut was vetoed by US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who, as his payment of $13 billion from government-owned AIG to Goldman Sachs showed, believes that bankers take priority over taxpayers. The only one to speak up for the Irish was UK chancellor George Osborne, but Geithner, as always, got his way. An instructive, if painful, lesson in the extent of US soft power, and in who our friends really are.
The negotiations went downhill from there. On one side was the European Central Bank, unabashedly representing Ireland's creditors and insisting on full repayment of bank bonds. On the other was the IMF, arguing that Irish taxpayers would be doing well to balance their government's books, let alone repay the losses of private banks." ("Ireland's future depends on breaking free from bailout", Morgan Kelly, Irish Times)
So, Strauss-Kahn stuck up for Irish taxpayers over the banks, the bondholders, the ECB, and the US Treasury. Naturally, that made him persona non grata among the ruling throng.
And, there's more, too, because Strauss-Kahn's vision was not limited to currency alone, but involved broad structural changes to the IMF itself that would have reversed decades of neoliberal policies. DSK had settled on a new approach to policymaking; one that would abandon the worst elements of globalization and put greater emphasis on social cohesion, cooperation and multilateralism. Here's an excerpt from the speech titled "Human Development and Wealth Distribution" he gave in November 2010:
"….Adam Smithone of the founders of modern economicsrecognized clearly that a poor distribution of wealth could undermine the free market system, noting that: "The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful and…neglect persons of poor and mean condition…is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments."
This was over 250 years ago. In today's world, these problems are magnified under the lens of globalization….globalization also had a dark side. Lurking behind it was a large and growing chasm between rich and poorespecially within countries. An inequitable distribution of wealth can wear down the social fabric. More unequal countries have worse social indicators, a poorer human development record, and higher degrees of economic insecurity and anxiety. In too many countries, inequality increased and real wages stagnatedfailing to keep up with productivityover the past few decades. Ominously, inequality in the United States was back at its pre-Great Depression levels on the eve of the crisis….
An immediate task is to end the scourge of unemployment….Progressive taxation can also promote equity through redistribution, and this should be encouraged…."Inequality is corrosive" …."it rots societies from within…it illustrates and exacerbates the loss of social cohesion…the pathology of the age and the greatest threat to the health of any democracy." ("Human Development and Wealth Distribution", Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF)" Mike Whiney
The ruling one tenth of one percent have long since known that Strauss-Kahn had strayed off the reservation and with the impending resolution of the Greek crisis (that they created by design), they weren't about to see the fruits of their labor pissed away by a bleeding heart reformed globalist.
Remember, Strauss-Kahn is not a banker, he's an academic and a politician. And also remember that the head of the World Bank is appointed by the United States (remember the appointment of Paul Wolfowitz?) but not the head of the IMF so Strauss-Kahn was never a favorite choice of our elites in the first place.
Whitney brings up another interesting point and that is that Strauss-Kahn was clearly on record as trying to move the global reserve currency away from the dollar. His reasoning was that the dollar is too unstable and as most of us know, it's being propped up artificially by Tim Geithner and the Fed buying trillions of our own treasury bonds. We all know the implosion is coming, it's another housing bubble waiting to burst and with the elites keeping the dollar as the reserve currency, many nations will once again be imploded when they finally pull the plug. Perhaps Strauss-Kahn sees this coming and was acting to avoid a new global depression. Who knows.
But as Whitney points out, the future is never bright for those who dare question the dollar.
"So, Strauss-Kahn finds himself in the same crowd as Saddam Hussein and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, right? You may recall that Saddam switched from dollars to euros about a year before the war. 12 months later Iraq was invaded, Saddam was hanged, and the dollar was restored to power. Gaddafi made a similar mistake when "he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar." ("Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?" Ellen Brown, Op-Ed News) Libya has since come under attack by US and NATO forces which have armed a motley group of dissidents, malcontents and terrorists to depose Gaddafi and reimpose dollar hegemony.
And now it's Strauss-Kahn's turn to get torn to shreds. And for good reason. After all, DSK actually poses a much greater threat to the dollar than either Saddam or Gaddafi because he's in the perfect position to shape policy and to persuade foreign heads of state that replacing the dollar is in their best interests. And that is precisely what he was doing; badmouthing the buck. Only he was too dense to figure out that the dollar is the US Mafia's mealticket, the main way that shifty banksters and corporate scalawags extort tribute from the poorest people on earth. Strauss-Kahn was rocking the boat, and now he's going to pay." Mike Whitney
Strauss-Kahn is no angel, don't get me wrong. He took over the IMF in 2007 and since then he has been overseeing the end-game of the global elite's plans in many nations. They forced the end of subsidies on food in Egypt and Tunisia which devastated the populations and created what we now refer to as the Muslim Spring. But the plans were well underway long before DSK took over in 2007 and his attempt to rectify what was expected of Ireland and his recent statements about changing the way the IMF does business goes a long way to explain what he was probably going to do to help Greece at this very dangerous time for them.
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, also of Global Research, brings up another interesting aspect to all of this: the CIA/French connection.
France is no longer the kind of country where we would have to rename side dishes to Freedom Fries. They are now a full-on partner in the Global Free Market Wars and as Sarkozy's actions taking the lead in the contrived regime change is Libya indicates, he himself is completely on board with no reservations.
"The presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy has, in many regards, become a de facto US "client regime", broadly supportive of US corporate interests in the EU and closely aligned with US foreign policy."
…"As documented by Thierry Meyssan, the CIA played a central undercover role in destabilizing the Gaullist party and supporting the election of Nicolas Sarkozy (See Operation Sarkozy: How the CIA placed one of its agents at the presidency of the French Republic, Reseau Voltaire, September 4, 2008)
A Strauss-Kahn presidency and a "Socialist" government would have been a serious setback for Washington, contributing to a major shift in Franco-American relations. It would also have contributed to weakening America's role on the European political chessboard. It would also have changed the balance of power between America and "Old Europe" (namely the Franco-German alliance). It would have had repercussions on the internal structure of the Atlantic Alliance and the hegemonic role of the US within NATO." Michel Chossudovsky
Sarkosy and the CIA have an interesting historical relationship.
"But there is more than meets the eye. Nicolas Sarkozy's step father Frank G. Wisner II, a prominent CIA official who married his step mother Christine de Ganay in 1977 served as Deputy Executive Secretary of State under the helm of Cyrus Vance Senior, father of District Attorney Cyrus Vance Junior.
Is it relevant?
The Vance and Wisner families had close personal ties. In turn Nicolas Sarkozy had close family ties with his step father Frank Wisner (and his half brothers and sisters in the US and one member of the Wisner family was involved in Sarkozy's election campaign).
It is also worth noting that Frank G. Wisner II was the son of one of America's most notorious spies, the late Frank Gardiner Wisner (1909- 1965), the mastermind behind the CIA sponsored coup which toppled the government of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran in 1953. Wisner Jr. is also trustee of the Rockefeller Brothers Trust.
While these various personal ties do not prove that Strauss-Kahn was the object of a set-up, the matter of Sarkozy's ties to the CIA via his step father, not to mention the ties of Frank G. Wisner II to the Cyrus Vance family are certainly worth investigating. Frank G, Wisner also played a key role as Obama's special intelligence envoy to Egypt at the height of the January 2011 protest movement. " Michel Chossudovsky
Here is yet another fine example of the "heroic" CIA spinning their special brand of "pro-democracy" magic through-out the world. Installing the step-son of one of their own into the presidency of France while undermining that tedious thing called "national self-determination"
This entire operation has all the hallmarks of a CIA op. The way the media immediately jumped on board the "demonize DSK" train, and I mean ALL of the media without exception, indicates to me that the old ways of Project Mockingbird are still very much alive and well in the United States today. Even "alternative" media outlets jumped on-board right out of the gate, no matter how odd the story seemed to be at the time.
The damage is done. Like the torpedoing of Rod Blagojevich after he announced he would end all state contracts with Bank of America if they didn't fix the situation with Republic Windows and Doors, one thing seems to be certain; you don't mess with the banks and their agenda or you will be cast out on your ass and everyone, everyone right, left, or "center", will tow the CIA line so that the same thing doesn't happen to them.
Strauss-Kahn is effectively gone. Bloomberg's friend gave him bail after he resigned from the IMF and is allowing him to remain under house arrest somewhere in New York city. And why not? Once he was out of power, there's no sense in crippling him even more. As a matter of fact, showing him some mercy at this point does these globalists some good. It shows future problematic individuals that they can still be shown mercy by the masters even after they fall, just so long as they wise up and play ball.
My guess is they will keep him from talking to reporters, the few that would write an honest article about what happened, and in time the charges will simply go away and the news cycle will simply state that the accuser was "mistaken" or something like that and Strauss-Kahn will be allowed to roam free like Blago trying to tell his story to a bunch of CIA owned media personalities like Jon Stewart who won't listen or will simply continue the lies regardless of the truth having come out (just like Jon Steward did with his ambush interview with Blago)
As long as the media is in on the fix, nothing is beyond these people. They will violate any law, any code of decent human behavior, in order to achieve their financial and global agenda.
The message of DSK ultimately is that any amount of compassion and decency toward fellow human beings will not be tolerated, no matter small, no matter how minor, by the elites who run this planet. The hope we can glean from this is that Strauss-Kahn did try and that just goes to prove that there are those even among the elites who are opposed to this global agenda and perhaps others who may have been sitting on the fence up until now have seen this public lynching and become more committed to ending this banking empire, to finally taking a side. If the lynching of DSK is a threat to others then remember that powerful people often react altogether differently to threats than most of us. You won't see it, you won't hear about it, but perhaps there is a growing dissent movement within the global halls of power that we just don't know anything about… yet. We will have to wait and see.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/05/...y-the-cia/
Posted on May 20, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
UPDATE 2: In the original article I mention Jon Stewart's ambush of Rod Blagojevich in service to the banking interests. Ironically, fake "progressive" Jon Stewart did the exact same thing last night, attacking those who would dare not convict DSK in the press before the man has a chance to defend himself at trial. Perhaps Jon forgot to mention that his brother is a Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Americas Equities of the UBS Investment Bank, one of the very same institutions that would have suffered tremendously had DSK restructured Greece's debt. So Jon has a personal family interest in making sure DSK is tried in the court of public opinion and there is no denying that.
I have always said that Jon Stewart is a fraud, a fake "liberal", and a mouthpiece for the globalist banking cartel, this just goes to prove it even more.
UPDATE: Case in point, the "progressive" media outlet, AlterNet has 2 stories about DSK today… the first lumps DSK in with the Governator and Newt, and the second praises the victim and openly convicts the accused based on absolutely no evidence prior to his trial. So much for innocent until proven guilty when the CIA gets involved.
Schwarzenegger, DSK, and Gingrich: Do We Have Psychopaths Misruling Our World?
Accusing DSK of Sexual Assault Took Guts
-
Here's a little more information about the Struass-Kahn case. What do Strauss-Kahn's recent history with Ireland and Sarkozy's family ties to the CIA have to do with African chamber maids in New York? Inquiring minds want to know.
Apparently during the Irish crisis, Strauss-Kahn had put together a plan with Irish leaders to reduce their debt by a considerable amount by devaluing unguaranteed bonds, effectively making global banks pay for some of their own "stupidity". The Irish loved the plan, Tim Geithner did not. Mike Whitney over at Global Research explains it:
"In fact, he started mucking around in other stuff, too, like when he intervened on behalf of Irish taxpayers, trying to protect them at the expense of foreign bondholders. That's a big "No no" in banker's world. They keep a list of "people who count", and taxpayers are not on that list. Here's an excerpt from the Irish Times:
"Ireland's Last Stand began less shambolically than you might expect. The IMF, which believes that lenders should pay for their stupidity before it has to reach into its pocket, presented the Irish with a plan to haircut €30 billion of unguaranteed bonds by two-thirds on average. (Irish finance minister) Lenihan was overjoyed, according to a source who was there, telling the IMF team: "You are Ireland's salvation."
The deal was torpedoed from an unexpected direction. At a conference call with the G7 finance ministers, the haircut was vetoed by US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who, as his payment of $13 billion from government-owned AIG to Goldman Sachs showed, believes that bankers take priority over taxpayers. The only one to speak up for the Irish was UK chancellor George Osborne, but Geithner, as always, got his way. An instructive, if painful, lesson in the extent of US soft power, and in who our friends really are.
The negotiations went downhill from there. On one side was the European Central Bank, unabashedly representing Ireland's creditors and insisting on full repayment of bank bonds. On the other was the IMF, arguing that Irish taxpayers would be doing well to balance their government's books, let alone repay the losses of private banks." ("Ireland's future depends on breaking free from bailout", Morgan Kelly, Irish Times)
So, Strauss-Kahn stuck up for Irish taxpayers over the banks, the bondholders, the ECB, and the US Treasury. Naturally, that made him persona non grata among the ruling throng.
And, there's more, too, because Strauss-Kahn's vision was not limited to currency alone, but involved broad structural changes to the IMF itself that would have reversed decades of neoliberal policies. DSK had settled on a new approach to policymaking; one that would abandon the worst elements of globalization and put greater emphasis on social cohesion, cooperation and multilateralism. Here's an excerpt from the speech titled "Human Development and Wealth Distribution" he gave in November 2010:
"….Adam Smithone of the founders of modern economicsrecognized clearly that a poor distribution of wealth could undermine the free market system, noting that: "The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful and…neglect persons of poor and mean condition…is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments."
This was over 250 years ago. In today's world, these problems are magnified under the lens of globalization….globalization also had a dark side. Lurking behind it was a large and growing chasm between rich and poorespecially within countries. An inequitable distribution of wealth can wear down the social fabric. More unequal countries have worse social indicators, a poorer human development record, and higher degrees of economic insecurity and anxiety. In too many countries, inequality increased and real wages stagnatedfailing to keep up with productivityover the past few decades. Ominously, inequality in the United States was back at its pre-Great Depression levels on the eve of the crisis….
An immediate task is to end the scourge of unemployment….Progressive taxation can also promote equity through redistribution, and this should be encouraged…."Inequality is corrosive" …."it rots societies from within…it illustrates and exacerbates the loss of social cohesion…the pathology of the age and the greatest threat to the health of any democracy." ("Human Development and Wealth Distribution", Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF)" Mike Whiney
The ruling one tenth of one percent have long since known that Strauss-Kahn had strayed off the reservation and with the impending resolution of the Greek crisis (that they created by design), they weren't about to see the fruits of their labor pissed away by a bleeding heart reformed globalist.
Remember, Strauss-Kahn is not a banker, he's an academic and a politician. And also remember that the head of the World Bank is appointed by the United States (remember the appointment of Paul Wolfowitz?) but not the head of the IMF so Strauss-Kahn was never a favorite choice of our elites in the first place.
Whitney brings up another interesting point and that is that Strauss-Kahn was clearly on record as trying to move the global reserve currency away from the dollar. His reasoning was that the dollar is too unstable and as most of us know, it's being propped up artificially by Tim Geithner and the Fed buying trillions of our own treasury bonds. We all know the implosion is coming, it's another housing bubble waiting to burst and with the elites keeping the dollar as the reserve currency, many nations will once again be imploded when they finally pull the plug. Perhaps Strauss-Kahn sees this coming and was acting to avoid a new global depression. Who knows.
But as Whitney points out, the future is never bright for those who dare question the dollar.
"So, Strauss-Kahn finds himself in the same crowd as Saddam Hussein and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, right? You may recall that Saddam switched from dollars to euros about a year before the war. 12 months later Iraq was invaded, Saddam was hanged, and the dollar was restored to power. Gaddafi made a similar mistake when "he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar." ("Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?" Ellen Brown, Op-Ed News) Libya has since come under attack by US and NATO forces which have armed a motley group of dissidents, malcontents and terrorists to depose Gaddafi and reimpose dollar hegemony.
And now it's Strauss-Kahn's turn to get torn to shreds. And for good reason. After all, DSK actually poses a much greater threat to the dollar than either Saddam or Gaddafi because he's in the perfect position to shape policy and to persuade foreign heads of state that replacing the dollar is in their best interests. And that is precisely what he was doing; badmouthing the buck. Only he was too dense to figure out that the dollar is the US Mafia's mealticket, the main way that shifty banksters and corporate scalawags extort tribute from the poorest people on earth. Strauss-Kahn was rocking the boat, and now he's going to pay." Mike Whitney
Strauss-Kahn is no angel, don't get me wrong. He took over the IMF in 2007 and since then he has been overseeing the end-game of the global elite's plans in many nations. They forced the end of subsidies on food in Egypt and Tunisia which devastated the populations and created what we now refer to as the Muslim Spring. But the plans were well underway long before DSK took over in 2007 and his attempt to rectify what was expected of Ireland and his recent statements about changing the way the IMF does business goes a long way to explain what he was probably going to do to help Greece at this very dangerous time for them.
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, also of Global Research, brings up another interesting aspect to all of this: the CIA/French connection.
France is no longer the kind of country where we would have to rename side dishes to Freedom Fries. They are now a full-on partner in the Global Free Market Wars and as Sarkozy's actions taking the lead in the contrived regime change is Libya indicates, he himself is completely on board with no reservations.
"The presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy has, in many regards, become a de facto US "client regime", broadly supportive of US corporate interests in the EU and closely aligned with US foreign policy."
…"As documented by Thierry Meyssan, the CIA played a central undercover role in destabilizing the Gaullist party and supporting the election of Nicolas Sarkozy (See Operation Sarkozy: How the CIA placed one of its agents at the presidency of the French Republic, Reseau Voltaire, September 4, 2008)
A Strauss-Kahn presidency and a "Socialist" government would have been a serious setback for Washington, contributing to a major shift in Franco-American relations. It would also have contributed to weakening America's role on the European political chessboard. It would also have changed the balance of power between America and "Old Europe" (namely the Franco-German alliance). It would have had repercussions on the internal structure of the Atlantic Alliance and the hegemonic role of the US within NATO." Michel Chossudovsky
Sarkosy and the CIA have an interesting historical relationship.
"But there is more than meets the eye. Nicolas Sarkozy's step father Frank G. Wisner II, a prominent CIA official who married his step mother Christine de Ganay in 1977 served as Deputy Executive Secretary of State under the helm of Cyrus Vance Senior, father of District Attorney Cyrus Vance Junior.
Is it relevant?
The Vance and Wisner families had close personal ties. In turn Nicolas Sarkozy had close family ties with his step father Frank Wisner (and his half brothers and sisters in the US and one member of the Wisner family was involved in Sarkozy's election campaign).
It is also worth noting that Frank G. Wisner II was the son of one of America's most notorious spies, the late Frank Gardiner Wisner (1909- 1965), the mastermind behind the CIA sponsored coup which toppled the government of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran in 1953. Wisner Jr. is also trustee of the Rockefeller Brothers Trust.
While these various personal ties do not prove that Strauss-Kahn was the object of a set-up, the matter of Sarkozy's ties to the CIA via his step father, not to mention the ties of Frank G. Wisner II to the Cyrus Vance family are certainly worth investigating. Frank G, Wisner also played a key role as Obama's special intelligence envoy to Egypt at the height of the January 2011 protest movement. " Michel Chossudovsky
Here is yet another fine example of the "heroic" CIA spinning their special brand of "pro-democracy" magic through-out the world. Installing the step-son of one of their own into the presidency of France while undermining that tedious thing called "national self-determination"
This entire operation has all the hallmarks of a CIA op. The way the media immediately jumped on board the "demonize DSK" train, and I mean ALL of the media without exception, indicates to me that the old ways of Project Mockingbird are still very much alive and well in the United States today. Even "alternative" media outlets jumped on-board right out of the gate, no matter how odd the story seemed to be at the time.
The damage is done. Like the torpedoing of Rod Blagojevich after he announced he would end all state contracts with Bank of America if they didn't fix the situation with Republic Windows and Doors, one thing seems to be certain; you don't mess with the banks and their agenda or you will be cast out on your ass and everyone, everyone right, left, or "center", will tow the CIA line so that the same thing doesn't happen to them.
Strauss-Kahn is effectively gone. Bloomberg's friend gave him bail after he resigned from the IMF and is allowing him to remain under house arrest somewhere in New York city. And why not? Once he was out of power, there's no sense in crippling him even more. As a matter of fact, showing him some mercy at this point does these globalists some good. It shows future problematic individuals that they can still be shown mercy by the masters even after they fall, just so long as they wise up and play ball.
My guess is they will keep him from talking to reporters, the few that would write an honest article about what happened, and in time the charges will simply go away and the news cycle will simply state that the accuser was "mistaken" or something like that and Strauss-Kahn will be allowed to roam free like Blago trying to tell his story to a bunch of CIA owned media personalities like Jon Stewart who won't listen or will simply continue the lies regardless of the truth having come out (just like Jon Steward did with his ambush interview with Blago)
As long as the media is in on the fix, nothing is beyond these people. They will violate any law, any code of decent human behavior, in order to achieve their financial and global agenda.
The message of DSK ultimately is that any amount of compassion and decency toward fellow human beings will not be tolerated, no matter small, no matter how minor, by the elites who run this planet. The hope we can glean from this is that Strauss-Kahn did try and that just goes to prove that there are those even among the elites who are opposed to this global agenda and perhaps others who may have been sitting on the fence up until now have seen this public lynching and become more committed to ending this banking empire, to finally taking a side. If the lynching of DSK is a threat to others then remember that powerful people often react altogether differently to threats than most of us. You won't see it, you won't hear about it, but perhaps there is a growing dissent movement within the global halls of power that we just don't know anything about… yet. We will have to wait and see.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/05/...y-the-cia/
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"