Seven Questions about 9/11

[James H. Fetzer]

Kyle,

Your replies are superficial and not well-founded. As an example, I took a look at the windows on the Twin Towers, which were 18" across in frames that were three meters wide. Since there were no windows between floors, that means that less than 50% of the fascade of the towers was glass. Suppose that parts had passed through those openings: more than 50% would have crumpled outside the buildings, with wings and tail breaking off and bodies, seats, and luggage falling to the ground. None of that actually happened, where the plane simply passed effortlessly into the buildings.

Moreover, Flight 11 hit the North Tower at an angle and thereby intersected with seven (7) floors, while Flight 175 intersected with eight (8). Each of those floors consisted of steel trusses connected to the core columns at one end and the external support columns at the other. They were filled with 4-8" of concrete, where, at 208' a side, they represented an acre of concrete apiece. Imagine what would happen if a plane were to collide with just one of those (seven or eight) floors suspended in space!

As for the angle, the plume of white smoke exiting from the plane appears to be perpendicular to the building, which falsifies your argument based upon perspective. Jack White did the study, where I have found his research extremely valuable, just as it was in this case. I love it when you cites some other source instead of offering your own arguments, which suggests you don't know what you are talking about. That seems to me to fit you to a "t". Your arguments are not serious. I am not impressed.

Jim

We would not expect a car crashing into an enormous tree to disappear into the tree.

Sure, were that enormous tree carved out into a bunch of open office space with windows all over the face like the towers were:



A car going fast enough would shred right through that, or a enormous tree carved into something like it.

So I asked a friend of minewho is better at these things than am Iif he could size the image of a Boeing 757 to the tail shown in the frame that the Pentagon had released:

You would do well to have your friend try again with this image of a 757:



The angle of the plane relative to the camera in that picture is far more comparable to the one the pentagon released than the image your friend used.

Another student of the Pentagon, James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above

Do you not realize that your second link there is pointing out the fact that the James Hanson's supposed rain forest vine looks a lot more like airplane insulation?:



As for the rest of your arguments about the Pentagon, 911review.com does well addressing them in their Errors section.