12-07-2011, 12:48 PM
Jim,
I am not publishing my work at this time in a formal manner. I may not bother to as I don't see the point in publishing work which is preliminary. Others at the 911 Free Forum may choose to publish their findings which I support and might contribute graphics etc.
I have produced over 30 graphics, some of which I have posted on this site such as the graphics below of the Factor Of Safety study which IS preliminary and will vary depending on the actual mass of the towers. Or the explanation of the collapse/self buckling of the core which survived the floor destruction shown below.
I am also posting a graphic about "collapse" time and what we can see. These charts are based on theoretical values and don't consider the resistance of air to free falling material. What they do predict is how much of the towers one can see (from the level of destruction down) as related to the speed of the destruction down the tower. I suppose the next step would be to correlate these to the actual videos of tower 1 to determine which is the highest floor which can be seen before the free falling debris blocks our view... and then revise the collapse duration interval.
Perhaps a reader can provide the information from studying the video of the collapse of tower one as to what was the highest floor seen before the canopy of falling debris eclipses our view.
I continue to produce graphics and do calculations and study the visual record as do other researchers at the 911 Free Forums such as Tim, femr2, Oz, Achimspok, OWE, Enik and others. Investigation and research continues and is advancing our understanding and falsifying some of the mainstream 911 Truth movement's pet theories such as Hoffman/Chandler/Gage/Cole et al's "explosive controlled demolition", or Wood's DEW and Mini Nukes in the sub basements.
I suppose that there will come a time to assemble and present the case representing the best evidence and understanding of how the towers came down. This does involve many science and engineering disciplines and most of them are above my pay grade and yours too! So this presentation likely will be a group effort produced by those who have the requisite technical background in the various disciplines. In the end the explanation / presentation must be made comprehensible and credible by John and Jane Q Public and that in itself is a difficult problem to solve considering the complexity of the science and engineering concepts which are involved.
It's the public which must then demand any new investigation or conduct one which goes beyond what happened to determine who ACTUALLY made it happen and bring about justice and accountability. All indications at this time is that we went after the wrong conspirators.
Research is ongoing.
I am not publishing my work at this time in a formal manner. I may not bother to as I don't see the point in publishing work which is preliminary. Others at the 911 Free Forum may choose to publish their findings which I support and might contribute graphics etc.
I have produced over 30 graphics, some of which I have posted on this site such as the graphics below of the Factor Of Safety study which IS preliminary and will vary depending on the actual mass of the towers. Or the explanation of the collapse/self buckling of the core which survived the floor destruction shown below.
I am also posting a graphic about "collapse" time and what we can see. These charts are based on theoretical values and don't consider the resistance of air to free falling material. What they do predict is how much of the towers one can see (from the level of destruction down) as related to the speed of the destruction down the tower. I suppose the next step would be to correlate these to the actual videos of tower 1 to determine which is the highest floor which can be seen before the free falling debris blocks our view... and then revise the collapse duration interval.
Perhaps a reader can provide the information from studying the video of the collapse of tower one as to what was the highest floor seen before the canopy of falling debris eclipses our view.
I continue to produce graphics and do calculations and study the visual record as do other researchers at the 911 Free Forums such as Tim, femr2, Oz, Achimspok, OWE, Enik and others. Investigation and research continues and is advancing our understanding and falsifying some of the mainstream 911 Truth movement's pet theories such as Hoffman/Chandler/Gage/Cole et al's "explosive controlled demolition", or Wood's DEW and Mini Nukes in the sub basements.
I suppose that there will come a time to assemble and present the case representing the best evidence and understanding of how the towers came down. This does involve many science and engineering disciplines and most of them are above my pay grade and yours too! So this presentation likely will be a group effort produced by those who have the requisite technical background in the various disciplines. In the end the explanation / presentation must be made comprehensible and credible by John and Jane Q Public and that in itself is a difficult problem to solve considering the complexity of the science and engineering concepts which are involved.
It's the public which must then demand any new investigation or conduct one which goes beyond what happened to determine who ACTUALLY made it happen and bring about justice and accountability. All indications at this time is that we went after the wrong conspirators.
Research is ongoing.