War by Deception Director's Cut (three hour video)

[Ed Jewett]

Well, now, said the church lady, isn't that special?

I have notes which I will type up in good time. (How do I best preserve their provenance?) How about if I dictate them with my voice recognition system?

The 1st annotation seems to be at the mark of 7 min. and 58 seconds with the question in and about the section on John Stockman. I found the introduction to be stunning; the next comment is, quite literally, "drill-in-progress techniques, players" was to remind myself to note that this is a film that more extensively ties together a series of what have been called by professionals "state crimes against democracy" and conceives or describes them in a manner that suggests that the "lessons learned" [as noted in Cheney's meeting at which he discussed the lessons learned from Iran Contra, which I believe is documented here at DPS already] have been brought forward through a series of linked events featuring many of the same players. Veterans here at DPS will recognize many elements; I think the discussion about this movie may be more interesting than the movie in some quarters.

Later on I wrote "boom boom boom boom take that, Cass Sunstein" [which I posted elsewhere]. I paused to post the film about the 15 min. mark in 2 locations, and to notify several others of the film and the threads.

I wrote what I recall was something of my own very poor attempt to mimic another DPF member when I jotted down the words "dust-preserved myth busted dusted petrification of video evidence".

I noted and found John Miller's report about telephones being disabled (just prior to the appearance of Dan Rather) which I found to be very telling information. I wrote a 3 word expletive at the 39:30 mark, noted the word "busted" at around 41:00ff (if one can use that notation relative to video), made a special note of the "2nd question on or about 51:49 mark, thought the comment about comparing the convergence of the authors of compounding and continuing narratives to be a means of identifying prime suspects was fascinating, noted the remark to myself that the film had "OODA-looped" the known arguments, fields of contention, and to some extent body of work in 9/11.

My next serious notation at about the 55 min. mark is the question to myself "Is continuity of government actually a code word for the plan itself, and/or the military-industrial fascist governmental corporate twisted skein itself? Is COG the plan itself?".

I made further note of the comment at about the 56:30 mark on the retention of information versus lies.

I made a note to myself to requote the text at about 57:18.

Over the course of the entire program starting about at that moment, I made notes as to how many errors or questions or topics requirING further verification in my mind; at that point I had to count at about one-half to perhaps 2, which increased to not more than 5 or 6 maximum throughout the entire program. Several of those were in fact minor or might qualify as either typos by the graphics editor or by narrator mis-speak working for himself. [If he is.]

I made a series of other notes a very minor nature; one example is a notation of several books: "The Rod to Damascus goes through Baghdad" and "Afghan Vortex", made further note of the quote paraphrased here (the dumbest man in the world Doug Feith). I made a note of the discussion at about the 70 min. mark on ends versus meanswell technically, that's probably not an accurate statement, noted that lengthy Paul statement from the floor of Congress about the 72 min. mark and the use of the word "unenthusiastically" which I felt deserved some further thought.

I made another mark at 1:24 "busted", note of a fact checking needed at 1:25, another "busted" at 1:26 repeated particularly at around the 1:29 mark with the testimony of Wilkerson ending in a 3 word phrase. I thought the discussion by Wayne White at the 1:31 mark about nodes was very interesting. As was Paul Pillars' comment on intel versus policy at the 1:32 mark. I made further note of the book by Perle referenced at 1:34 [ need to verify and identify precisely the title of that book], made note of the article "A Necessary War". I referenced a point about Libby that was later clarified and thought that the discussion about bunkers and command posts in general at the mark of about 2 min. shy of 2 hours was worthy of expansion.

Note was made also of the repetitive this of destruction of evidence as a team point in these SCADs.

I made another remark of "busted" at the 2:08 mark. At about 2 hours and 20 min. in, I paused to check to see if anyone had made any other posts, questioned the identity of the music at the 2 hour and 35 min. mark (is it from "Braveheart"?), made note of the individual named ? Donna Lessman? At about the 2:40 mark, made note of the reference to Aramark, made note of the comment made by the individual I had identified as Chalmers Johnson at about the 2:54 mark and thereafter "things that can't go on forever don't."At about the 2 hour and 59 min. mark I noted commentary about the malfunction of the sole massive central elevator in one of the WTC's (or both?) that extended over time requiring" maintenance", clearly the strongest supposition or identifier of the placement of in-tower explosives.

The ending of the film was winding up at about the 3 hour mark; there is a good deal of data that follows and can be noted by freeze framing. It is clear the entire film will have to be watched to 2 to 3 times with one hand on the pause button.

I made note of the "instructions" posted at the 3 hour, five-minute mark, asked myself why those instructions would be listed and in that method and made special note of the ending sequence, and then wrote my last comment the form of a 3 word question "tweaking our noses?".

The question is "Who OODA-looped who here?".