07-03-2009, 05:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-03-2009, 05:39 PM by Peter Lemkin.)
Progressive to Radical Environmental Consensus is that a human population of about 1 Billion is maximal amount for a sustainable Planet; less in the future, with higher demands per person, BUT environmentalists, and such want to carefully lower the numbers humainly - no wars, no killing, no starvation, no extreme limits on family size, no infanticide, equity in all nations, regions, ethnicities, etc. [there are ways to do this I could expand on.] Global pop. now is just under 7 B and will reach 9 -11 no matter what, short of some catastrophic events. So, what we are calling for is. cutting down to 1/10th - a VERY tall order!!!! Drastic measures!
The elites may also feel they need to cut the numbers (for different reasons), but I'll bet they care not how....or who suffers and how much they suffer. Jan is probably correct that they have some tricks up their sleeves and can see some events that are coming down the pike they can expoit....imagine a worldwide 'Katrina' - or viral pandemic, or whatever they have planned - and you have a modern real-world version of 'hell'....The kind of thing we thought we had buried with the last World War.
The elites may also feel they need to cut the numbers (for different reasons), but I'll bet they care not how....or who suffers and how much they suffer. Jan is probably correct that they have some tricks up their sleeves and can see some events that are coming down the pike they can expoit....imagine a worldwide 'Katrina' - or viral pandemic, or whatever they have planned - and you have a modern real-world version of 'hell'....The kind of thing we thought we had buried with the last World War.