25-10-2011, 02:01 AM
Not to revive on old thread without warrant but there are some researchers that make a pretty convincing case that many of the floors of the twin towers were non-exant. There are old photographs of the towers showing light coming through with no window blind effect you would expect from flooring. This theory could easily be de-bunked by witnesses who worked on said floors... but that hasn't happened. If true, the hollow tower theory could explain an ease of destruction and lack of debris. Can anyone conclusively debunk the partly floorless tower theory?