03-12-2011, 10:09 AM
Charles,
You are wrong on both counts. And what would Landsdale be doing other than waiting to speak with George H.W. Bush?
I expect rubbish from people like Seamus Coogan, but not from you. I hope you will give this further thought, my friend.
And precisely what do you "suspect" me of doing? Working to defeat research on the assassination of JFK? Are you mad?
Jim
You are wrong on both counts. And what would Landsdale be doing other than waiting to speak with George H.W. Bush?
I expect rubbish from people like Seamus Coogan, but not from you. I hope you will give this further thought, my friend.
And precisely what do you "suspect" me of doing? Working to defeat research on the assassination of JFK? Are you mad?
Jim
Charles Drago Wrote:Given the fact that we have not been able to use the conspiracy truth to batter down the walls protecting the assassination's sponsors means that we must continue to persuade generation after generation of the basic fact of life we recognize.
Jim Fetzer's endorsements of the propositions that LBJ is the assassination's "mastermind" and that G.H.W. Bush is captured in crime scene photos do inestimable harm to our greater causes -- establishing the basic truth, communicating it to the people, and using it to inspire the people to overthrow the rule of the assassination's Sponsors.
I find the coordinated timings of the Fetzer-led resurgences of the Bush-was-there and LBJ-as-mastermind hypotheses to be both suspect and damaging.
Damaging, that is, to our efforts to establish truth and bring about justice as a consequence.