30-12-2011, 08:26 PM
Forgive me folks for what appears to have been a drive-by post, straight from the seagull school of management (fly in, take a dump on someone, fly out), but right after I did so, I came down with the flu. (I am still trying to figure out how they embedded that virus inside the YouTubes.)
And I will have to re-bury my head in the pillow (having shaved, taken a slog or three of OJ and a slosh of some kind of Quil) in order to be ready to meet my holiday obligation of tending to a one-year old who has just learned to walk (and thus to explore).
The material is posted in several paces with several links in order to allow a wide range of people some time and freedom to explore the videos, statements, theories and evidence presented by this fellow Chiarini. I also e-mailed it widely. I am new to it all and haven't even had the opportunity to explore it all in depth myself. I am in the habit, especially here where we purportedly have unbiased minds sharpened and wizened in the ways of deep politics, psy ops, media utilization by state actors, and more, of posting this material so that it will be picked apart, the waste material thrown to the heap (including the entire carcass, if appropriate).
With regard to the facial recognition stuff, eyes, ears, etc., I think he's right on with one or three of his first examples but then takes liberty and license to stretch it to see if how widely that theory can be applied. I don't think he makes his case convincingly, although I will allow an open mind based on further exploration by others. in fact, yes, some of them are laughers.
However, there is one piece of footage (possibly more) - I shall return when the New Year is properly swaddled -- which, to my eye, is prima facie evidence of pre-knowledge, pre-scripting of a state crime against democracy and the murder of 3,000 US citizens, and that comes in what appears to be the "headers" and footers" of satellite-fed videos of line on-scene coverage on 9/11 in which the TV news reporter (for Fox?) approaches the curb in order to interview a "witness" and the witness says "I don't know what role I am supposed to play". There are lesser examples as well, but I'll stay focused on that one for the moment.
If there is video evidence of pre-knowleedge, pre-scripting, and role-playing during a live supposedly unforeseen event in which thousands of people were murdered and those actors can be connected back to Maurice Greenberg [I assume everyone here is truly conversant with his history, his role at AIG, the history of AIG, the role of AIG before, during and after impact on 9/11], then there is prima facie evidence of treason. [The connection to Goldberg is not necessary for the charge to be made.][ I assume All US citizens here can familiarize themselves with the applicable misprision of treason legislation.
I want someone here to tell me that what I am seeing is not what I saw, and to prove it.
Otherwise, when the New Year is properly suckled and swaddled, I have a raft of letters to write and mail (registered, signature of acceptance required) to prepare for mailing.
Back to my pillow.
And I will have to re-bury my head in the pillow (having shaved, taken a slog or three of OJ and a slosh of some kind of Quil) in order to be ready to meet my holiday obligation of tending to a one-year old who has just learned to walk (and thus to explore).
The material is posted in several paces with several links in order to allow a wide range of people some time and freedom to explore the videos, statements, theories and evidence presented by this fellow Chiarini. I also e-mailed it widely. I am new to it all and haven't even had the opportunity to explore it all in depth myself. I am in the habit, especially here where we purportedly have unbiased minds sharpened and wizened in the ways of deep politics, psy ops, media utilization by state actors, and more, of posting this material so that it will be picked apart, the waste material thrown to the heap (including the entire carcass, if appropriate).
With regard to the facial recognition stuff, eyes, ears, etc., I think he's right on with one or three of his first examples but then takes liberty and license to stretch it to see if how widely that theory can be applied. I don't think he makes his case convincingly, although I will allow an open mind based on further exploration by others. in fact, yes, some of them are laughers.
However, there is one piece of footage (possibly more) - I shall return when the New Year is properly swaddled -- which, to my eye, is prima facie evidence of pre-knowledge, pre-scripting of a state crime against democracy and the murder of 3,000 US citizens, and that comes in what appears to be the "headers" and footers" of satellite-fed videos of line on-scene coverage on 9/11 in which the TV news reporter (for Fox?) approaches the curb in order to interview a "witness" and the witness says "I don't know what role I am supposed to play". There are lesser examples as well, but I'll stay focused on that one for the moment.
If there is video evidence of pre-knowleedge, pre-scripting, and role-playing during a live supposedly unforeseen event in which thousands of people were murdered and those actors can be connected back to Maurice Greenberg [I assume everyone here is truly conversant with his history, his role at AIG, the history of AIG, the role of AIG before, during and after impact on 9/11], then there is prima facie evidence of treason. [The connection to Goldberg is not necessary for the charge to be made.][ I assume All US citizens here can familiarize themselves with the applicable misprision of treason legislation.
I want someone here to tell me that what I am seeing is not what I saw, and to prove it.
Otherwise, when the New Year is properly suckled and swaddled, I have a raft of letters to write and mail (registered, signature of acceptance required) to prepare for mailing.
Back to my pillow.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"