27-01-2012, 05:21 AM
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Albert,
Ralph has seen something no one else has noticed for nearly 50 years--and it is decisive! What I cannot understand is why you should be so up in arms over a major advance in JFK research. Why is that? If you care about the truth of the assassination, you should be celebrating, not making these petty, unwarranted and disparaging remarks about a man who intellect exceeds your own by some considerable measure. But then I digress.
Why, because your "theory" is absolute bs and draws ridicule and questions of credibilty on JFK research.
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Let me ask a parallel question. Ralph and I do not see things EXACTLY the same way, because I believe Billy Lovelady when he went to the FBI and showed them the shirt he was actually wearing. Now I must ask, do you know ANYONE who would go to the FBI and claim that they had been wearing a shirt IF THEY HAD NOT BEEN WEARING THAT SHIRT? I don't know anyone like that. Maybe you do. I ask: WOULD YOU DO THAT?
Because he remembered the wrong shirt. Pretty simple for someone who presents himself as a professor. There's an easy way to tell which shirt it is. Look at the color shot of Loveday standing to the side on the steps. The blurred color signature is clearly not that of the striped shirt.
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Because not only has Ralph shown that the shirt on the man in the doorway was Oswald's shirt--based on the texture, the lapel, the way it lies, the missing buttons--but I have shown that the shirt on the man in the doorway IS NOT LOVELADY'S SHIRT. And that is the case whether you accept the SHORT SLEEVED, VERTICALLY STRIPED SHIRT or the BRIGHTLY CHECKERED SHIRT. Is that really SOMETHING YOU CAN'T SEE?
When pressed to show actual evidence Ralph goes into long descriptions of crazy talk only he himself believes. Nothing he points out as clear proof is either there or visible and is always the product of Ralph's mind as he talks himself into believing it is there.