TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[Greg Burnham]

Monk,

The evidence and proof are laid out so painstakingly and so thoroughly that I am dumbfounded by these remarks. If you want to challenge our work, then explain what premises we have wrong or where our reasoning is faulty. Do that or pass by in silence. This work is "rock solid" or I would not have put my name on it. Ralph noticed that what mattered was not the faces but the shirts! He was absolutely determined to work this out and we have been dealing with it for months. If you can show where we have gone wrong, do that. Persumably, there is no better place to subject research on the assassination of JFK than on a JFK assassination research forum. You remarks here, I regret to say, are absurd.

Jim

Good Lord!!!

I agree that this is the place to submit new work for REVIEW. It is not the place to EXPECT a genuflection at the foot of the altar! I said as much in a KIND way. I have no interest in pursuing yet another angle of conspiracy proof. That is my prerogative. I have enough proof. If you want to pursue any subject of your choosing that is your prerogative and I have no objection to that--nor should it matter to you even if I did so object...unless you know me to be a man who will tell you the truth as I see it even if you don't like it. However, you are grossly out of line if you are unwilling to accept the criticism of other qualified students of the assassination without biting their head's off.

They are not buying it. Let it go. I don't mean "let the project go" I mean let it go that they are not buying it! Who cares? Obviously you and Cinque are absolutely convinced that you have it all figured out. So, why do you need anyone else's blessing? Moreover, I'm not invested in conducting ANY further research into this particular aspect of the assassination. That is my prerogative. My only intent in commenting at all was to suggest that your mastery of the art of persuasion is sorely lacking. Your expectations regarding the reception you believed you would enjoy from others is unrealistic. Are you guys right about your belief? I don't know, but I read all 20 pages and looked at hundreds of photographs (that I have already studied ad nauseum over a decade ago) placed in collages that FAILED to persuade. Are you guys right? I do not know. I don't even care. However, I do know that your expectations of others is way too high.

The absurdity of this thread does not reside in my earlier post, Jim. Your interpretation of that post, however, is an extension of it.

I will not challenge your premises for lack of interest, but, I will not be told to pass by silently if I don't. How little you know me, Jim, after all these years. That you fancy yourself capable of dictating what I respond to and what I pass silently by is the absurdity of absurdities.

Do you really think you can get away with speaking to me like that?

I will not say this twice.