TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[Jan Klimkowski]

Where are your arguments, Jan? What do we have wrong? Show us what we have wrong, OK?
There are so many cute remarks here and so little intelligent thought. What happened to DPF?

The White Queen only believed six impossible things before breakfast...

For the avoidance of doubt, this is directed at the Emeritus Professor and his snake oil salesman sidekick.

Prof Fetzer - Albert, Greg, Charles and others have posted plenty of reasons why your and Cinque's interpretation of the imagery is unproven. Indeed, I will go further - it is highly dubious.

My objection is more fundamental. You and Cinque are reading Altgens 6 as an Aleph. You are ignoring its tangled genesis and you are placing an interpretration on a piece of evidence which that evidence is incapable of sustaining.

Altgens 6 is not a Magic Bullet that solves this case.

Betting the house on a piece of evidence so ambiguous and dubious is a gift for those who continue to cover up the crime.

It is a gift for all those who want to write us off with the ultimate elite-sanctioned slur: "conspiracy theorist" - usually combined by MSM with "irrational", "lacking rigour", "sloppy" and "fool".

Evidence needs to be critically evaluated in all its facets, and once a realistic appraisal of the quality of an individual piece has been reached, that evidence should not be over-interpreted.

Altgens 6 simply will not bear the weight that you and Cinque attribute to it.

Meanwhile, in another thread here, I asked you the following question to which I do not believe you have replied yet:

CD's question: "Do you accept the so-called 'confession' of E. Howard Hunt as a completely truthful statement made without hidden agendas to deceive and disinform?"

JF's answer: "It was basically truthful, of course, since he was unburdening his conscience to his son as he was approaching death."

Jim - having analyzed all that is known about E Howard Hunt - his life, his known actions, his extensive fictional forays, his ruthlessness - is this your considered, informed, position on his 'confession'?

NB Prof Fetzer's answer is longer, and can be seen in this thread, but the above is the first sentence of his response to the question.