08-02-2012, 07:30 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Albert Doyle strongly disagreed with me, and we went 'round and 'round. And at times, I lost my cool.
Ah, but that disagreement needs to be more precisely defined. The point I disagreed on was the suggestion that the Chicago plot could not have been pulled-off. I speculate that if a bat of bricks somehow fell on Oswald by chance the Chicago plot would have been executed. There was nothing to stop the Chicago plot prior to it being exposed. The full Northwoods patsy scenario was in place with a brain-damaged patsy whose personal profile could accommodate any slew of CIA false accusations and defamation just like Oswald. Otherwise, if you read carefully, everything you write is true and doesn't necessarily conflict with this. It's a very complicated room full of mirrors that can adopt many different possibilities. Though admittedly somewhat far-fetched, Vallee could have been used to tie Oswald to the Assassination underground in order for Oswald to be painted as a co-conspirator. This association would then be used to get him into Cuba with the Baker virus. I believe someone said intel always has at least two objectives to its black operations. The problem with this scenario, as Mark Lane shows, is that Oswald seemed to be set-up in Mexico for purposes favorable to making him a patsy rather than Vallee.
There's too many possibilities to make such firm conclusions. For instance Oswald could have been told he was going to be part of a plot where Vallee took shots at Kennedy but missed while Cuban agents were exposed to information showing Oswald was part of this plot. You have Lee Harvey Oswald associations with the Chicago plot like NY driver's licenses etc, that could have been part of this Oswald sheep-dipping in which Oswald was also being deceived. Oswald could then be swung cooperatively into the Depository on the 22nd thinking he was part of this important plot and still remaining operational all the way up until his death.
Oh yeah, I would add the "Oswald in Doorway" claim is provenly false for those who bother to follow the evidence.