03-02-2012, 02:53 AM
Ralph Cinque Wrote:You are the one who is being irrational, Greg. Frazier said Lovelady was in front of him. That is a specific direction and Doorman was most certainly NOT in front of him.
But, here is where you are being most irrational: WE CAN SEE OSWALD IN THE PICTURE. DOORMAN IS WEARING HIS CLOTHES! THAT TRUMPS EVERYTHING!
And I do mean everything.
And you are BEGGING THE QUESTION!
We cannot see "Oswald" in the picture. You are the one who originally objected to "Doorway Man" being referred to as "Lovelady" because it was yet to be determined. I even agreed with that objection. So, he is not "Oswald" nor is he "Lovelady" until the debate has resolved.
Now you employ a double standard and commit the exact same illogical fallacious offense with which you took exception, IN SPADES!
Knock it the fuck off. I grow weary of your idiocy.
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)