14-02-2012, 05:41 PM
Perhaps there is error in photo evaluation. I did ask whether the Jack White noted was our Jack White.
Me, at that time, I was fluttering rapidly between the PC in my basement office and the TV in the living room at a location 200 miles to the northeast. We have seen how the effluent from television has become corrupted (and indeed it has been "charted" on that very morning's coverage), and we have seen how the Internet has been targeted for massive "cognitive" infiltration, and we know who has done the targeting. As a mere citizen, I can only count on the investigative research done by others, or do what little I can manage on my own. I did listen to a podcast and read the "riposte" by Alan Sabrosky last night, and see the debate this morning on precisely who it was who attacked Israeli embassies. What happened on Vesey Street that morning (as well as what happened elsewhere) will be debated for another half-century, just as some debate what color/pattern in shirts was seen in doorways.
I am reading, albeit slowly, Marvin Minsky's book "The Emotion Machine" and just last night uploaded the audiobook "Your Body is Your Subconscious Mind" (with the provocative back panel title "Your Brain Is Not in Charge") by Candace Pert.
Is there room in the debates and conversations on deep politics for an understanding of the singularity of mind and body, for clairsentience, for psychosomatic understandings and paranormal cognitive capacities?
Is it possible to look beyond the most precise understanding of what it is that we see or comprehend and form some kind of gnosis on the basis of disparate and seemingly unrelated information?
Me, at that time, I was fluttering rapidly between the PC in my basement office and the TV in the living room at a location 200 miles to the northeast. We have seen how the effluent from television has become corrupted (and indeed it has been "charted" on that very morning's coverage), and we have seen how the Internet has been targeted for massive "cognitive" infiltration, and we know who has done the targeting. As a mere citizen, I can only count on the investigative research done by others, or do what little I can manage on my own. I did listen to a podcast and read the "riposte" by Alan Sabrosky last night, and see the debate this morning on precisely who it was who attacked Israeli embassies. What happened on Vesey Street that morning (as well as what happened elsewhere) will be debated for another half-century, just as some debate what color/pattern in shirts was seen in doorways.
I am reading, albeit slowly, Marvin Minsky's book "The Emotion Machine" and just last night uploaded the audiobook "Your Body is Your Subconscious Mind" (with the provocative back panel title "Your Brain Is Not in Charge") by Candace Pert.
Is there room in the debates and conversations on deep politics for an understanding of the singularity of mind and body, for clairsentience, for psychosomatic understandings and paranormal cognitive capacities?
Is it possible to look beyond the most precise understanding of what it is that we see or comprehend and form some kind of gnosis on the basis of disparate and seemingly unrelated information?
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"