15-02-2012, 04:40 PM
Charles,
This sounds bizarre. "Weaponizing a photograph"? He and I and many others are convinced that the image to the right/front of Doorway Man has had its face and shirt obfuscated. Everything Ralph has been arguing of which I am aware has a foundation in the evidence. I really think this is a travesty for a forum like this.
Moreover, I don't get the reference to "appeals to authority". Are you unaware that there are both fallacious and non-fallacious appeals to authority? It is when someone who is cited as an authority in one area is being cited as an authority in another area in which he is not an expert that is fallacious. Do you know that?
Citing me on philosophy, logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning is non-fallacious because I am an expert in those areas. To cite me in relation to polio vaccines would be fallacious, because I am not expert on that subject. Ralph is an expert on bodies and has been making excellent non-fallacious contributions.
I no longer understand you, even remotely. It appears to me that you and the forum have lost your way, which is acutely disappointing.
Jim
This sounds bizarre. "Weaponizing a photograph"? He and I and many others are convinced that the image to the right/front of Doorway Man has had its face and shirt obfuscated. Everything Ralph has been arguing of which I am aware has a foundation in the evidence. I really think this is a travesty for a forum like this.
Moreover, I don't get the reference to "appeals to authority". Are you unaware that there are both fallacious and non-fallacious appeals to authority? It is when someone who is cited as an authority in one area is being cited as an authority in another area in which he is not an expert that is fallacious. Do you know that?
Citing me on philosophy, logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning is non-fallacious because I am an expert in those areas. To cite me in relation to polio vaccines would be fallacious, because I am not expert on that subject. Ralph is an expert on bodies and has been making excellent non-fallacious contributions.
I no longer understand you, even remotely. It appears to me that you and the forum have lost your way, which is acutely disappointing.
Jim
Charles Drago Wrote:Jim,
In case you are unaware, "Cinque" was banned not because I or any other owner of DPF "disagree" with "his" conclusions.
In case you are unaware, I am of the opinion that Altgens 6 has been weaponized to support the cover-up.
In case you are unaware, I and others have concluded that "Cinque," wittingly or otherwise, is wielding that weapon.
In case you are unaware, arguments from authority are recognized as such at DPF and treated accordingly.
Charles