Opinions on Roscoe White story?

[Peter Lemkin]

Mr lemkin your posts are quite confusing .. the one on another thread you write that you know via "friends" what happened to mr shaw due to to the roscoe white forum implying there a threat ...than on this thread you write how the story is disinformation ..which is it ...get your story together

Methinks Mr. Ortiz is easily misled or is a misleader. Without going into details, much of 'Roscoe White' 'story' was produced by the very crowd in charge of the JFK assassination cover-up and was false. As with all good disinformation, it also contained some elements of truth...but the false bits were set as traps to ensnare researchers and to then equate the truthful bits [or yet undiscovered real bits] with the false and planted bits. I could go into details. Jack White and others could likely do a better job of it [but, as mentioned, Jack is not well enough, sadly, at this time to do so], but somehow have not yet gotten the sense that this thread is a real appeal for information or a platform for disinformation. Sorry, if I have it wrong Mr. Ortiz...just a gut feeling after long years in these 'ol 'cotton fields'. :wirlitzer:

My 'act' as you so indelicately put it is 'together'. You just here to rustle the bushes?! There is a world of difference between real information and flase planted information [the former much suppressed about Dallas; the later all too much of - both at the hands of the official cover up which started before the deed, and continues still!]. IMO, after decades of work on this matter, R. White was involved in the assassination and with others involved in the assassination; however, the son and the researchers pursuing his role were [in part] fed DISinformation to throw them off the scent trail to his real role. What they had to present was a mixed bag of part truth and part planted untruths. Get your disruption act together, perhaps.