The plane crashes of 9/11 were fabrications . . .

[Ed Jewett]

Apparently, snide remarks constitute the best of attempts at discussion, dialogue and comprehension here.

That's sophistry Mr Jewett.


Please answer how they coud manipulate the images that persons who took videos from locations within view of the Twin Towers captured and showed to their friends who saw these unaltered videos clearly depicting planes flying into the towers.

Fair question. Nothing snide about it.

There's nothing fallacious about it, Mr. Doyle. The issue is addressed in the films. Your request sentence is littered with presumptions or poor assumptions. The simplest of answers is that some of the footage or background could have been shot in advance of the event for use or insertion during the event and its broadcast, movies, or media coverage. Or perhaps some of the technical capabilities are inherent in the military tools of WESCAM, or "black budget/weaponry" tools of animation, simulation, computer graphics, etc.

Furthermore, given the previous history [in this event as well as prior events] of planted evidence, multiple references or inferences to "actors", and the depth of an ability to go undercover inherent in at least two or three of the suspected "perp" agencies, every fact and assumption must be questioned.

As noted here, folks here and elsewhere are still debating the veracity and validity of evidence in the Dealey Plaza matter, and the technologies of psy-op have grown substantially in five decades. But the playbooks remain intact and archived [e.g., Operation Northwoods].

Furthermore, the involvement and capacities of computerized systems under the control of the US government, the Israeli government, its military system technologies' contractors and intelligence agencies, their connection to PNAC, and to the 9/11 Commission, is already well documented.

Given the many issues, questions and obvious "errors" or "flaws" in the media coverage, and the fact that there has been a phenomenal effort underway to suppress evidence or viewing of it, the task is to surface information and analyze it, not suppress it, question it, or mischaracterize it.