13-06-2012, 09:52 AM
Again the keepers of dogma convict themselves.
The paradox was identified by Bertrand Russell in Sixteen Questions 6 September 1964:
In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?
"There was no conspiracy. There was one man firing. There were three bullets fired. Every loose end was pursued and the 26 volumes of ten million words are definitive and final."
Case closed.
Repressing history.
Repeating the lie.
No, you may not look behind the curtain.
There's nothing there anyway.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3836[/ATTACH]
The paradox was identified by Bertrand Russell in Sixteen Questions 6 September 1964:
In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?
"There was no conspiracy. There was one man firing. There were three bullets fired. Every loose end was pursued and the 26 volumes of ten million words are definitive and final."
Case closed.
Repressing history.
Repeating the lie.
No, you may not look behind the curtain.
There's nothing there anyway.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3836[/ATTACH]