05-07-2012, 03:02 PM
Much is made, and rightfully so, about the backdoors that get inserted into software, whether it be operating systems, database systems, trojan horses, etc., for surveillance, subterfuge, sabotage, or computer/finance/theft. Everyone has to be very careful about what they import into their computers. What seems eminently clear, especially if you have read "Thresholds of the Mind" and understand the science behind the power of auto-suggestion, binaural-beat-driven brain-wave neuroplasticity, etc., is that people have discovered the back door into your own mind, past the "sentinel" that guards the locked file drawer of your awareness and beliefs, the operating system of your mind. Some use that to improve their own mental performance; some apparently use it or engineer technologies that can furtively take control of your mind and its distributed psychoneuroimmunologic network of peptides, hormones and neurons to make you do things you might not otherwise do.
The primary reference is to an article by Gerald Oster in an article in the Oct. 1973 issue of Scientific American and its fancy graphic; see p. 137 of "Thresholds".
[What is curiously interesting is that, in replacing my copy (given away to someone else), I got a used copy whose bookmark was a business card of someone in "change management" at Boeing. ]
I've been reading about this stuff since about 1986; my list of sources is published.
What is evident, based on several sources, is this knowledge is widely available and used within the security states apparati and easily accessed if one has massed surveillance software set on permanent search for intellectual property. There is ample evidence it has been used in the development of "products" created for and by identifiable intelligence agency "cut-out" companies (one is specifically identified in WMR's book about the insertion of Obama into the Presidency, and that one is active in a variety of ways).
Fear and paranoia can and are often seen by others as a sign of mental deficiency and, indeed, a great deal of research into these topical areas has already been conducted by the London-based Tavistock Institute, itself an outgrowth of ... well, do your own homework. That TPTB have used their knowledge of fear to engineer control is well understood. For your own edification, a good read might be "Deep Survival" by Laurence Gonzalez.
The primary reference is to an article by Gerald Oster in an article in the Oct. 1973 issue of Scientific American and its fancy graphic; see p. 137 of "Thresholds".
[What is curiously interesting is that, in replacing my copy (given away to someone else), I got a used copy whose bookmark was a business card of someone in "change management" at Boeing. ]
I've been reading about this stuff since about 1986; my list of sources is published.
What is evident, based on several sources, is this knowledge is widely available and used within the security states apparati and easily accessed if one has massed surveillance software set on permanent search for intellectual property. There is ample evidence it has been used in the development of "products" created for and by identifiable intelligence agency "cut-out" companies (one is specifically identified in WMR's book about the insertion of Obama into the Presidency, and that one is active in a variety of ways).
Fear and paranoia can and are often seen by others as a sign of mental deficiency and, indeed, a great deal of research into these topical areas has already been conducted by the London-based Tavistock Institute, itself an outgrowth of ... well, do your own homework. That TPTB have used their knowledge of fear to engineer control is well understood. For your own edification, a good read might be "Deep Survival" by Laurence Gonzalez.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"