08-08-2012, 04:17 PM
I can hardly begin to count all the wrongs with Jim's Project. What is this monomania about the stupid photo? If the Altgens' photo never even existed there would still be hundreds of other examples which point to Oswald's innocence. As a piece of the puzzle of that day in Dallas Altgen's photo has value as do many other pieces. It tells us many things. It tells part of the story. But it is central to nothing and certainly has nothing to do with Oswald 'innocence' or guilt. Jim's promotion of this silliness and placing himself central to it just makes him look ridiculous and also is incredibly disrespectful to the great work of many serious researchers over the decades. I am just gobsmacked. :jawdrop:
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.