30-08-2012, 04:59 PM
Absolut Lee Not or the four fingers?
The answer is very simple:
Absolut Lee Not, by a mile.
It is imaginative, powerful, inspiring and speaks a thousand words.
Deeps the subconscious into the forrest.
On the other hand the four fingers, are unimaginative, powerless, unspiring and speaks one word.
Deeps the subconscious into a tree.
The first symbol deals with the big picture, while the second with specific details.
It is more important to know that Oswald did not kill JFK and he was framed as a patsy in a conspirancy,
than to believe that four shots were fired that day. So what if they were 4, 5,6, 7, or 20.
Makes no difference.
Should i repeat Salandria's words to Fonzi?
The answer is very simple:
Absolut Lee Not, by a mile.
It is imaginative, powerful, inspiring and speaks a thousand words.
Deeps the subconscious into the forrest.
On the other hand the four fingers, are unimaginative, powerless, unspiring and speaks one word.
Deeps the subconscious into a tree.
The first symbol deals with the big picture, while the second with specific details.
It is more important to know that Oswald did not kill JFK and he was framed as a patsy in a conspirancy,
than to believe that four shots were fired that day. So what if they were 4, 5,6, 7, or 20.
Makes no difference.
Should i repeat Salandria's words to Fonzi?