30-08-2012, 05:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-08-2012, 11:03 PM by Charles Drago.)
Albert, as is most often the case, your thoughts and the manner in which you express them in writing are impenetrable.
What "trust" ever existed between the Sponsors of the JFK assassination and their victims?
"Discontent"??? So sorry to have disturbed you.
Attention, Sponsors of the JFK assassination! You have discontented us! You have filled us with acrimony! We are vexed ... terribly vexed!
I wonder how it is that you can "defer to the Deep Politics process" when, as you clearly indicate by admitting that you cannot see the myriad fatal weaknesses and divisive properties in Prior's process, you haven't the slightest understanding of that process.
What "trust" ever existed between the Sponsors of the JFK assassination and their victims?
Albert Doyle Wrote:I guess what I'm getting at is a show of discontent over a phony 50th Anniversary observance conducted by the murderers themselves doesn't necessarily conflict with the Deep Politics perspective in the JFK Assassination. Of course I defer to the Deep Politics perspective and suggest any such protest be done under the informed guidance and knowledge of that perspective and any public attention such an organized protest might bring should be referred to the Deep Politics viewpoint. Ultimately, if the four finger protest served to weaken or divide the Deep Politics stance then it should yield - however I have yet to see how it would.
"Discontent"??? So sorry to have disturbed you.
Attention, Sponsors of the JFK assassination! You have discontented us! You have filled us with acrimony! We are vexed ... terribly vexed!
I wonder how it is that you can "defer to the Deep Politics process" when, as you clearly indicate by admitting that you cannot see the myriad fatal weaknesses and divisive properties in Prior's process, you haven't the slightest understanding of that process.