15-09-2012, 12:52 AM
See also
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ural-Model
I found the above discussion quite constructive and educational.
Jeffrey
You write an awful lot as you end the refrain, two lines:
And then the founder of DP calls me out as being naive and clueless about deep politics.. which presumably explains the destruction of the world trade center as a deep political event. If you can't see it get out of the kitchen kinda thing.
This thread was about a mechanical model and so I would think technical matters are as germane as sponsors... but heck... what do I know?
Take these a line at a time:
And then the founder of DP calls me out as being naive and clueless about deep politics.. which presumably explains the destruction of the world trade center as a deep political event. If you can't see it get out of the kitchen kinda thing.
Charles is a co-founder. He worked with George Michael Evica to develop a deep political model involving sponsors, facilitators and mechanics. They have discussed the significant role of false sponsors.
You have architectural credentials, but your deductions about events are that there is nothing which is not either shown in the plain, or easily deduced in a quick read. Are you seriously offended that your views are not more highly regarded.
I don't think Charles ever said "naive and clueless"--and that would be redundant. Let me compare:
A friend says get a load of this great Chris Angel trick, dude reaches through the glass--I said, no, he had a glass fabricator make a pane with a deep slot and it slides, not magic, not by worlds.
You suggest Muslims are offended. Muslims fly planes into buildings. Buildings fall. Time to go home, nothing to see here.
I of course found Judy Woods' breathless "microwave weapons" laughable when aired on Coast to Coast to millions, but I do not find the predictable subsequent removal of the inconvenient Saddam Hussein and the profitable access to 90% of the world's heroin merely coincidental.
I do not presume there is not a causal link, any more than I presume Chris Angel is capable of magic, or the set-aside of the known characteristics of the universe.
In this you most assuredly insist that because you do not see it, it cannot be. And you wonder that that attitude meets objection.
In another clear case of magic, David Blaine street magician levitates. It must be so. The crowd is aghast, amazed.
The crowd is a group of paid shills lying, acting, feigning. There was an engine hoist. An engine hoist. It didn't show in the camera frame.
Consider your second and final note:
This thread was about a mechanical model and so I would think technical matters are as germane as sponsors... but heck... what do I know?
No, this thread was not about a "mechanical" model. Its title The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 911 is a deep political model, not a mechanical one.
Technical matters did not sponsor the event. You say "pissed-off" people acted out after being "pushed-around" by U.S.A. Good, that's what you're supposed to think. You have no need for a deep political explanation.
The nineteen men boarded four flights to paradise, obtained 1,368 virgins, and all we got out of it was an attaboy from Fahd and Ahmadinejad for removing their bete noire and 90% of the world's heroin.
John O'Neill knew. Our Federal Bureau of Investigation fired his inconvenient ass--and he died in the collapse of the towers.
Just angry victims acting out. Nothing to see here.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ural-Model
I found the above discussion quite constructive and educational.
Jeffrey
You write an awful lot as you end the refrain, two lines:
And then the founder of DP calls me out as being naive and clueless about deep politics.. which presumably explains the destruction of the world trade center as a deep political event. If you can't see it get out of the kitchen kinda thing.
This thread was about a mechanical model and so I would think technical matters are as germane as sponsors... but heck... what do I know?
Take these a line at a time:
And then the founder of DP calls me out as being naive and clueless about deep politics.. which presumably explains the destruction of the world trade center as a deep political event. If you can't see it get out of the kitchen kinda thing.
Charles is a co-founder. He worked with George Michael Evica to develop a deep political model involving sponsors, facilitators and mechanics. They have discussed the significant role of false sponsors.
You have architectural credentials, but your deductions about events are that there is nothing which is not either shown in the plain, or easily deduced in a quick read. Are you seriously offended that your views are not more highly regarded.
I don't think Charles ever said "naive and clueless"--and that would be redundant. Let me compare:
A friend says get a load of this great Chris Angel trick, dude reaches through the glass--I said, no, he had a glass fabricator make a pane with a deep slot and it slides, not magic, not by worlds.
You suggest Muslims are offended. Muslims fly planes into buildings. Buildings fall. Time to go home, nothing to see here.
I of course found Judy Woods' breathless "microwave weapons" laughable when aired on Coast to Coast to millions, but I do not find the predictable subsequent removal of the inconvenient Saddam Hussein and the profitable access to 90% of the world's heroin merely coincidental.
I do not presume there is not a causal link, any more than I presume Chris Angel is capable of magic, or the set-aside of the known characteristics of the universe.
In this you most assuredly insist that because you do not see it, it cannot be. And you wonder that that attitude meets objection.
In another clear case of magic, David Blaine street magician levitates. It must be so. The crowd is aghast, amazed.
The crowd is a group of paid shills lying, acting, feigning. There was an engine hoist. An engine hoist. It didn't show in the camera frame.
Consider your second and final note:
This thread was about a mechanical model and so I would think technical matters are as germane as sponsors... but heck... what do I know?
No, this thread was not about a "mechanical" model. Its title The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 911 is a deep political model, not a mechanical one.
Technical matters did not sponsor the event. You say "pissed-off" people acted out after being "pushed-around" by U.S.A. Good, that's what you're supposed to think. You have no need for a deep political explanation.
The nineteen men boarded four flights to paradise, obtained 1,368 virgins, and all we got out of it was an attaboy from Fahd and Ahmadinejad for removing their bete noire and 90% of the world's heroin.
John O'Neill knew. Our Federal Bureau of Investigation fired his inconvenient ass--and he died in the collapse of the towers.
Just angry victims acting out. Nothing to see here.