15-09-2012, 01:14 AM
Phil,
I do not deny something that I can't see. I only affirm that I can't see it... and may not be convinced of something that I can't see.
Yes the thread was about a political model... and mechanics referred to the fellows who were to so called boots on the ground guys.
I did go off into a mechanics.. as in physics... tack and that was wrong .. at least in THIS thread.
Correct me if I am wrong but the model assumes that there was a CD...
My approach has been to figure out what TECHNICALLY/physically happened and my research has found there was CD and so I don't bother to consider the type of political models that is being proposed. My efforts are to further the investigation to nail what actually happened to those buildings. And if they were CDed then we have a new ball game.
Others enter the mystery puzzle from the cui bono perspective and that's the MIC of course and so they did it and CD is their MO.
Jeffrey
I do not deny something that I can't see. I only affirm that I can't see it... and may not be convinced of something that I can't see.
Yes the thread was about a political model... and mechanics referred to the fellows who were to so called boots on the ground guys.
I did go off into a mechanics.. as in physics... tack and that was wrong .. at least in THIS thread.
Correct me if I am wrong but the model assumes that there was a CD...
My approach has been to figure out what TECHNICALLY/physically happened and my research has found there was CD and so I don't bother to consider the type of political models that is being proposed. My efforts are to further the investigation to nail what actually happened to those buildings. And if they were CDed then we have a new ball game.
Others enter the mystery puzzle from the cui bono perspective and that's the MIC of course and so they did it and CD is their MO.
Jeffrey