05-10-2012, 07:18 AM
From Charles:
Charles,
Good questions. Perhaps I should have used the word 'benefits' instead of 'profit' because 'profit' also suggests money and wealth as well. The term 'benefits' and 'rewards' may
include non-monetary items or conditions. Political power could be one type of 'reward', or it could be some kind of career promotion. It would depend upon who the particular
Sponsor is, and what that person (or group?) expects the positive result to be for themselves. One would think that Sponsors also take the responsibility and the risk of setting
up the operation, providing rewards to their underlings and protecting them or even eliminating them (to prevent themselves from being discovered).
It might be interesting to see what benefits accrued to some suspects in the JFK case. Police routinely look for such in everyday murder cases where it might become a factor. A
simple example is someone who is listed as a beneficiary on a life insurance policy and who kills the insured to pay off a gambling debt, or just wants the insurance money.
I happen to know of one associate of Jose A. Rivera's who had a major upward shift in his career after the JFK assassination. Whether Rivera or his friend would or could be classified
as sponsors or facilitators is not possible to know at this time, but it is known that Rivera knew a great many details about the impending assassination of JFK seven months before it
happened.
Adele
Quote: Originally Posted by Adele Edisen
Shouldn't the "Sponsors" be the ones who profit the most from such operations?
Adele
Quote: Are you suggesting that the Sponsors of JFK's assassination deserve to be rewarded with maximum profit?
Or that we can discover the identities of Sponsors by identifying those who profited most from the hit?
And what sort of metrics do you propose to use to quantify such profit?
Charles,
Good questions. Perhaps I should have used the word 'benefits' instead of 'profit' because 'profit' also suggests money and wealth as well. The term 'benefits' and 'rewards' may
include non-monetary items or conditions. Political power could be one type of 'reward', or it could be some kind of career promotion. It would depend upon who the particular
Sponsor is, and what that person (or group?) expects the positive result to be for themselves. One would think that Sponsors also take the responsibility and the risk of setting
up the operation, providing rewards to their underlings and protecting them or even eliminating them (to prevent themselves from being discovered).
It might be interesting to see what benefits accrued to some suspects in the JFK case. Police routinely look for such in everyday murder cases where it might become a factor. A
simple example is someone who is listed as a beneficiary on a life insurance policy and who kills the insured to pay off a gambling debt, or just wants the insurance money.
I happen to know of one associate of Jose A. Rivera's who had a major upward shift in his career after the JFK assassination. Whether Rivera or his friend would or could be classified
as sponsors or facilitators is not possible to know at this time, but it is known that Rivera knew a great many details about the impending assassination of JFK seven months before it
happened.
Adele