05-10-2012, 06:53 PM
Adele Edisen Wrote:One would think that Sponsors also take the responsibility and the risk of setting up the operation, providing rewards to their underlings and protecting them or even eliminating them (to prevent themselves from being discovered).
Hi Adele,
Actually, your suggestion does not conform to the model's definition of Sponsor.
A Sponsor gives his or her blessing -- or permission -- for the event and contracts and/or commands the participation of highest-level Facilitators and sub-systems. Facilitators are responsible for doing as you suggest.
Adele Edisen Wrote:It might be interesting to see what benefits accrued to some suspects in the JFK case. Whether Rivera or his friend would or could be classified as sponsors or facilitators is not possible to know at this time, but it is known that Rivera knew a great many details about the impending assassination of JFK seven months before it happened.
In terms of the model's definitions, it is indeed knowable at this time that "Rivera and his friend" are NOT Sponsors of the JFK hit. False Sponsors, perhaps, but not the real deal. Did "Rivera" and/or "his friend" comprise or otherwise have the power to bend the supra-national security state to his/their will?
Benefits accrued across the Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic model. The values of those benefits can be measured subjectively only.
Thanks, by the way, for engaging in what for me is an enjoyable and enlightening exchange.
Charles