07-10-2012, 03:43 AM
Robert Morningstar is a dear friend who I last saw at George Michael Evica's funeral service.
He is also a source of spiritual insight and courage and controversy among JFK researchers.
I don't harbor a great deal of enthusiasm for Robert's Tippet-Kennedy body switch hypothesis. But I respect this and other aspects of his work on the JFK assassination and other deep political events as serious, thought-provoking research, and I most assuredly will NOT join the chorus of Robert's detractors who so swiftly and thoughtlessly dismiss his ideas.
I will, however, direct the attention of readers of this post to another thread started by "Betty Chruscielski" titled "Yes Virginia, there was a lead car" and found at
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...car./page4
In it, "Chruscielski" argues that JFK was shot by Greer AND by an occupant of the motorcade's lead car.
As I noted in post #39 of that thread:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.
I stand by these words today.
He is also a source of spiritual insight and courage and controversy among JFK researchers.
I don't harbor a great deal of enthusiasm for Robert's Tippet-Kennedy body switch hypothesis. But I respect this and other aspects of his work on the JFK assassination and other deep political events as serious, thought-provoking research, and I most assuredly will NOT join the chorus of Robert's detractors who so swiftly and thoughtlessly dismiss his ideas.
I will, however, direct the attention of readers of this post to another thread started by "Betty Chruscielski" titled "Yes Virginia, there was a lead car" and found at
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...car./page4
In it, "Chruscielski" argues that JFK was shot by Greer AND by an occupant of the motorcade's lead car.
As I noted in post #39 of that thread:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.
I stand by these words today.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene