09-10-2012, 05:05 AM
Adele Edisen Wrote:Charles,
I would tend to agree with you that Rivera was not in a position to, as you stated in your question: "Did "Rivera" and/or "his friend" comprise or otherwise have the power to bend the supra-national security state to his/their will?" Probably not on his own, but he may have had a hand in the plotting and planning of the event, whch in my understanding, should come under the auspices of a sponsor, since a facilitator is only in a secondary position, as an aide or helper, in this hierarchical triad of organized murderers.
Therefore, to be on the safer side, I wish to urge caution and sagacity here, because premature conclusions may mislead or discourage the search for more information and validation by investigators of the next generation.
Adele
Adele,
Let me be clear: My conclusions, like those of George Michael Evica, regarding Sponsors, Facilitators, and Mechanics are not "premature." They emerge from combined decades of research, study, and testing.
I politely urge you to give due consideration to the Evica-Drago model of the JFK conspiracy; your "understanding" of it is deeply flawed. If "Rivera" and/or "his friend" did not have the power to bend the supra-national security state to his/their will, then by definition within the context of the model they are excluded from the Sponsorship level of involvement.
Further, and again by the model's definition, Sponsors almost certainly neither "plotted" nor "planned" the assassination.
Finally, I must add that JFK assassination investigators of this, the next, or any other generation would be ill-served indeed by anyone feigning uncertainty in instances where firm conclusions have been reached. Accept or reject the E/D conspiracy model as you see fit, but as of this writing nothing we know about Rivera gives the slightest indication that he was, in the model's definition, a Sponsor of JFK's murder.
Nothing.
Charles