Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

[Peter Lemkin]

That was the evening news show in Danmark! Imagine that in the USA - NOT! I posted this url on 'another' Forum and the 'usual' Mockingbird asset said it was worthless due to his conjecture of thermite brought in on pallets [which this 'fowl' said would be noted and thus impossible]. When you can't shoot-down the science, attack the minutae of the messenger and persons involved in speaking truth to power... Surprised he didn't criticize his clothes. After all, the devil is in the det

Frankly I thought the speculative stuff about how explosives might have been placed in the WTC was counter productive to the rest of the interview. There's is a place for such speculation but that wasn't it - IMHO. There may have been subtleties of meaning lost in the sub-titling (ie he MAY have been saying something like "... well the amount of explosive material indicated by our research would requires pallet loads" or something like that). As it came across to people relying on the sub-titles though, it provided easy ammunition for cheap attacks as above - and a means to divert attention from the science.

IMO the time could have been better used to hammer home the FACT of its presence and to INSIST on the need for an official explanation of how the material DID get there, and where it came from, rather than speculating and thus providing the means -yet again- to divert peoples attention from what remains devastating (no pun intended) evidence.

Hmmm.....As I understand Danish, I'll listen again and see if the subtitles were mis-done....and report back. I agree not the place to speculate, but to report the paper, but the TV interviewer may also have led him astray. I'll review and report. In ANY CASE, speculation [if done] by the scientist, while not the best foot forward, takes NOTHING away from the science of the article. The Borg/Mockingbirds pick at whatever they can to debunk.